CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > CFX

re: Source Coefficient

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Like Tree2Likes
  • 2 Post By Gert-Jan

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   April 23, 2007, 12:43
Default re: Source Coefficient
  #1
Wooster
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I have a model with volumetric heat generation. There isn't much explanation of the "source coefficient" for volumetric heating and I was wondering if anyone knew how important this is to the final answer. At the moment, I'm getting more power out than I put in (m_dot*cp*dt) and, while it could be a number of things, I'd like to see if it could be that I need to enter a valid source coefficient to correlate the data.

-M
  Reply With Quote

Old   April 25, 2007, 14:10
Default Re: re: Source Coefficient
  #2
Gert-Jan
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi Wooster,

In a converged solution, the source coefficient does not influence the final value of the generated heat. It only helps to get a converged solution by - more or less -underrelaxing the source term.

If you have a source A, you should define a source coefficient between -A*1e-10 and -A*1. The first implies a weak underrelaxation. Then in general you do not require a lot of iterations but the solution might become unstable and you won't get a converged solution at all. The latter implies a strong underrelaxation. Then you might end up with a converged solution but you will need a lot of iterations.

Just try to find out what suites you best. If you get more power out than you put in, you should monitor you imbalances. If this isn't equal to zero, you need more iterations.

Regs, Gert-Jan

www.bunova.nl
Mazze[ITA] and r.mojtaba like this.
  Reply With Quote

Old   April 25, 2007, 15:37
Default Re: re: Source Coefficient
  #3
Wooster
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Thanks for the feedback. I wasn't 100% sure how the source coefficient worked and the manual is slightly confusing on how it works.

I think my problem with the power is due to the text file I was using had higher energy particles than what was measured in the benchmark, but I need to explore different reasons.

By imbalances, do you mean residuals? The residuals converge at about 26-30 iterations. The main residuals keeping it out that long are w-momentum and energy. w-momentum is just a function of my wild geometry.

-M
  Reply With Quote

Old   April 26, 2007, 04:16
Default Re: re: Source Coefficient
  #4
Gert-Jan
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
No, I do not mean residuals. In the solver manager you should create a new Monitor and then select that in submenu IMBALANCE you want to monitor mass, energy, momentum etc. These all should go to zero, meaning that what you put in comes out as well.

Gert-Jan

www.bunova.nl
  Reply With Quote

Old   April 26, 2007, 09:40
Default Re: re: Source Coefficient
  #5
Wooster
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Ok, thanks, I'll take a look at it and see what I can find.

-M

  Reply With Quote

Old   April 26, 2007, 15:43
Default Re: re: Source Coefficient
  #6
Phil
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
The source coefficient should just be an estimate of dS/dT.
  Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
swak4foam building problem GGerber OpenFOAM Installation 54 April 24, 2015 16:02
wmake compiling new solver mksca OpenFOAM Programming & Development 13 August 18, 2014 22:26
pisoFoam compiling error with OF 1.7.1 on MAC OSX Greg Givogue OpenFOAM Programming & Development 3 March 4, 2011 18:18
DxFoam reader update hjasak OpenFOAM Post-Processing 69 April 24, 2008 01:24
DecomposePar links against liblamso0 with OpenMPI jens_klostermann OpenFOAM Bugs 11 June 28, 2007 17:51


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 15:35.