 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
[Sponsors] | ||||
May 7, 2007, 11:01
|
CFX 10 VS CFX 11 for combustion
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Dear CFX users
I'm doing my master project working with CFX to simulate a non-premixed Bluff-Body type burner. I want to work with LES. I was wondering if there is major enhancement in the combustion model of CFX 11. Is there advantages to move from CFX 10 to CFX 11 in the area of reacting flows? (especifically for LES studies...) Thank you for your help |
|
|
||
|
May 8, 2007, 16:14
|
Re: CFX 10 VS CFX 11 for combustion
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
yes. cfx11 runs much faster.
|
|
|
|
||
|
May 9, 2007, 11:58
|
Re: CFX 10 VS CFX 11 for combustion
|
#3 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Thanks for your tips...
If anyone else have comments about it... please feel free Regards |
|
|
|
||
 |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| [ICEM] Proper way to name boundaries on 2D model for use in CFX? | RossFS | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 4 | November 10, 2011 02:38 |
| Pros and Cons for CFX, CFdesign, COMSOL | Val | Main CFD Forum | 3 | June 10, 2011 02:20 |
| CFX pressure in Simulations problem | nasdak | CFX | 1 | April 14, 2010 13:22 |
| PhD using CFX | Rui | CFX | 9 | May 28, 2007 05:59 |
| CFX 4.4 installation problem | Pandu Sattvika | CFX | 1 | December 1, 2001 04:07 |
Linear Mode
