CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > CFX

CFX or FLUENT, which one is better ?

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   June 12, 2007, 05:03
Default CFX or FLUENT, which one is better ?
  #1
lee
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi,

I am new to CFD, and will do a projet on Fluid Structure Interaction (FSI), mainly on a flexible cylinder undergoes Vortex Induced Vibration (VIV).

CFX or FLUENT, which is better for such task ?

Thanks a lot for the advice ! !

-lee

  Reply With Quote

Old   June 12, 2007, 05:56
Default Re: CFX or FLUENT, which one is better ?
  #2
Joe
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
For simple FSI geometries that dont require mesh adaptation I dont think there is any significant difference between CFX and Fluents capabilities.
  Reply With Quote

Old   June 12, 2007, 07:10
Default Re: CFX or FLUENT, which one is better ?
  #3
Stumpy
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
If the motion of the cylinder boundary is very simple to calculate given the fluid forces, such that you can prescribe the cylinder motion using a UDF in Fluent or CEL in CFX (e.g. simple 1 DOF motion), then either code is fine. If you need a structural code to solve the cylinder motion given the fluid forces then I would recommend CFX linked to ANSYS. The reason is that FSI using CFX and ANSYS gives an implicit solution, but using Fluent and MPCCI to link to a structural code is an explicit approach (i.e. the structural solution depends on the Fluent solution from the previous timestep rather than the current timestep). For fluid induced vibration problems an explicit approach can give the wrong answer.
  Reply With Quote

Old   June 12, 2007, 22:04
Default Re: CFX or FLUENT, which one is better ?
  #4
johnny
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I'd agree with Stumpy on this one. If you are trying to pick up flow induced vibrations, you will have to guarantee accuracy at each and every timestep. Only CFX/ANSYS can do that properly because it is semi-implicit.
  Reply With Quote

Old   June 12, 2007, 22:37
Default Re: CFX or FLUENT, which one is better ?
  #5
lee
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Thank you so much for your guys' kind comments and advice!

I also shoot a glance at the demo: http://www-harwell.ansys.com/demoroom/demos.php?id=11

I would start from CFX !

  Reply With Quote

Old   June 18, 2007, 22:38
Default Re: CFX or FLUENT, which one is better ?
  #6
ping
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
you could be sensible and use STAR-CD v4 which includes FV solving of the structure integrated into the same solver - no messy interfaces to another solver !
  Reply With Quote

Old   June 27, 2007, 15:17
Default Re: CFX or FLUENT, which one is better ?
  #7
sanghals
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
i did that with star cd v4 .... best solution

i am a very good cfx and ansys user and since i use star cd v4 for my fsi .... i stop using ansys products for fsi...
  Reply With Quote

Old   June 27, 2007, 17:05
Default Re: CFX or FLUENT, which one is better ?
  #8
HekLer
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Yes, this is fine if the limited structures physical model capability in star-cd is good enough.
  Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Mesh and Solve Times for CFX, Fluent, CD-adapco Jade M Main CFD Forum 4 August 28, 2012 02:54
Import CFX def into Fluent eric_wang FLUENT 0 April 18, 2011 13:14
OpenFOAM vs. Fluent & CFX marco Main CFD Forum 81 March 31, 2009 14:22
Fluent Vs CFX, density and pressure Omer CFX 9 June 28, 2007 04:13
Jobs in cfd - fluent or cfx? jobman Main CFD Forum 6 July 5, 2006 15:02


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 16:04.