CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > CFX

Computation Time compared to OpenFOAM

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   June 28, 2007, 12:05
Default Computation Time compared to OpenFOAM
  #1
Florian Fruth
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hey all, has anyone of you ever made a comparison of the computation times between cfx and openFOAM? I took a forward facing step supersonic example and computed it at first laminar. It seems like openFOAM is 10-20 times faster than cfx. Can one tune cfx somehow (e.g. leave away all unnecessary outputs) that it is faster? Or is the difference too big, such that the difference must be due to a wrong input of myself?

Regards Florian
  Reply With Quote

Old   June 28, 2007, 12:47
Default Re: Computation Time compared to OpenFOAM
  #2
opaque
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Dear Florian,

Would you mind sharing the mesh size you compared? Was it 10^4, 10^5 or > 10^6 elements?

Did you compare serial runs, or parallel runs? If your comparisons were in parallel, what was the mesh size (ballpark number is OK) on each the partitions?

Regards,

Opaque
  Reply With Quote

Old   June 28, 2007, 12:58
Default Re: Computation Time compared to OpenFOAM
  #3
Florian Fruth
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Sorry for the inaccurate question. So the mesh size is about 5000 elements, the run is in serial mode. The rms is set to be under 1e-05. It is a transient example, where I took a deltaT of 0.002s and computed 10s in reality. With openFOAM it took about 200 seconds to compute the result, whereas with cfx it would have taken about 5-6 hours!? I tried to take the same numerical schemes, but there are big differences and I tried to take approximately the same.

Cheers Florian
  Reply With Quote

Old   June 28, 2007, 13:08
Default Re: Computation Time compared to OpenFOAM
  #4
opaque
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Dear Florian,

Thanks for the information.. Do both codes use the same number of coefficient loops per time step?

Comparisons like this are useful, but must not be taken out of context. How will they compare for more complex physics, or larger meshes?

Try running CFX for largers meshes and see how the wall clock time scales.. Then, pick one of those meshes and see how OpenFoam compares.. I would look at meshes larger than 100 000

Keep us posted..

Opaque

  Reply With Quote

Old   June 29, 2007, 10:18
Default Re: Computation Time compared to OpenFOAM
  #5
Dave
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
What were you using that took 5-6 hours to run a 5000 element case (albeit a transient one)? It sounds like something is very wrong with your set-up, or you're using a computer that was built sometime in the 1980s.
  Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
New OpenFOAM Forum Structure jola OpenFOAM 2 October 19, 2011 06:55
createPatch / cyclicGgi / OpenFoam 1.5-dev OFU OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion 0 June 16, 2010 04:36
calculation diverge after continue to run zhajingjing OpenFOAM 0 April 28, 2010 04:35
Modified OpenFOAM Forum Structure and New Mailing-List pete Site News & Announcements 0 June 29, 2009 05:56
How to reduce star/kinetics computation time vigorzxy CD-adapco 0 May 9, 2005 12:29


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 17:14.