CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > CFX

Pitch Change & interface connections

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   August 3, 2007, 06:18
Default Pitch Change & interface connections
  #1
Kumar
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
There was already one thread in this index about pitch change but still i need clarification.

For an impeller(rot domain)& for a vaned diffuser (stationary domain) no of vanes are half the no of blades,I have two diff meshes from turbogrid.So I need frozen rotor interface in between.Also as I am going with a 360 degree case i need a ggi for periodic connections for them.Finally rot domain is connected to Inlet nozzle/pipe(Icem hex)with frozen rotor &Diffuser is connected to Volute(ICEM tet mesh) with a GGI.

hence I have four diff meshes with two frozen rotor interfaces and 3 GGI.

Does these no of interfaces affect the solution results? (resolutions are not differing too much)

Stiil I need any pitch change in between rot impeller domain and a stationary vaned diffuser?

My solutions are converging and there are no imbalances untill now even with no pitch change.Should I believe them?(Still validation of results is to be done.)

waiting for comments.

Thanks and regards,

Kumar.

  Reply With Quote

Old   August 3, 2007, 09:52
Default Re: Pitch Change & interface connections
  #2
Robin
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi Kumar,

The number of interfaces won't affect your solution. There can be some loss of the profile at an interface if the mesh resolution changes significantly, but the conserved variables, such as mass, momentum and energy, will all be conserved across the GGI.

Since you have a full 360 degree model there is no pitch change and you should therefore set your pitch change to "None". Also note that at the frozen rotor interface you can specify a pitch offset. This allows you to clock your blades to see the influence on the solution. You will find that the solution will vary with the relative position of the blades due to the wake profile and should try 10 to 20 different positions.

On the last point, trying different clocking positions, you might want to consider running a transient instead and calculating the time-averaged velocity, pressure, temperature, etc. Statistical fields can easily be set up in the Output Control in Pre when you have a transient analysis. In the end, it is less work and more accurate than running the series of clocked position.

Regards, Robin
  Reply With Quote

Old   August 5, 2007, 03:57
Default Re: Pitch Change & interface connections
  #3
Kumar
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Thanks Robin.

That means I was on the right path.

Still not thought of any transient runs. But what will be the changes i should do to run it as a transient case? And can i see a moving impeller in post with a steady run? or what should i do to see it?

  Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Solid/liquid phase change fabian_roesler OpenFOAM 10 December 24, 2012 07:37
Solid-fluid Interface question shankara.2 ANSYS Meshing & Geometry 2 September 14, 2011 13:49
Pitch and frame change Andy QUB ANSYS 4 July 8, 2010 06:10
interface problem c120613 CFX 2 May 18, 2010 15:32
Diffuse Interface Method in interFOAM duongquaphim OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 2 June 26, 2009 06:16


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:55.