CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > CFX

no converge - for Low Re Porous media seepage flow

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   August 29, 2007, 05:18
Default no converge - for Low Re Porous media seepage flow
  #1
lee
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi,

I am doing seepage flow simulation using Domain Interface method (Translational Periodicity). When pressure difference around 80Pa & flow velocity around 0.1m/s, the results agree well with the lab measured values.

However, as pressure difference decreases, e.g. delta_P=12 Pa, the simulation never converged, even though the mass flow rate fluctuated around an averaged value which is near to the experimental value (error, around 13%)

Can any one help figure out why no converge for low Re ??

I even using laminar model, still no converge.

Thanks in advance for your kind advice !

By the way, how much can we trust the averaged mass flow rate, it seems acceptable as the error is only around 13% ?

  Reply With Quote

Old   August 29, 2007, 11:15
Default Re: errors from solver ...
  #2
lee
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
+--------------------------------------------------------------------+ | ERROR #002100004 has occurred in subroutine Out_Scales_Flu. | | Message: | | The Reynolds number is outside of the range expected based on the | | Option selected for the TURBULENCE MODEL. Check this setting, | | the values of the properties, mesh scale, consistency of units | | and solution values in the input file. Execution will proceed. | +--------------------------------------------------------------------+

  Reply With Quote

Old   August 29, 2007, 18:12
Default Re: errors from solver ...
  #3
Glenn Horrocks
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi,

Don't worry about the Reynolds number warning. The solver works out this reynolds number using a relation which may not have any bearing on your simulation. Do a search on this forum and you will find explanations of the exact equation it uses.

You should work out the Reynolds number of the flow based on physically relevant length, velocity and fluid property scales and decide based on that whether the flow really is laminar or turbulent.

Glenn Horrocks
  Reply With Quote

Old   August 31, 2007, 01:12
Default Re: errors from solver ...
  #4
lee
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
thanks Glenn !

it works out when using smaller local timescale factor, my problem is a steady case, and with seperated flow & also maybe due to poor mesh aorund the edge

  Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How to model granular flow through porous media Axius FLUENT 2 August 7, 2014 10:34
Compressible flow through porous media? JoFFe CFX 2 November 1, 2010 05:50
spercritical fluid flow in porous media cachen FLUENT 3 November 10, 2007 03:20
Modeling porous media flow in prostar Nirmal Kumar Pathak CD-adapco 8 November 23, 2005 08:18
unidirectional flow in porous media Brian FLUENT 6 September 2, 2004 10:53


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:00.