CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > CFX

CFX vs 'cheap cfd packages'

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   December 17, 2007, 06:11
Default CFX vs 'cheap cfd packages'
  #1
Andrew
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
We're seeing more and more low cost CFD packages that claim to be suitable for almost all for buildings/ hvac / facilities cfd applications.

I have seen a report where a company used a 'cheap' CFD to model the wind flow around buildings on a project - it looks like they used FLAIR.

It has been suggested that these packages are used only to create graphics for a system that you're already 100% confident is going to work and you merely want to communicate your ideas to a client.

Has anyone used FLAIR, Microflow, or any of the other cheaper CFD packages (compared to the likes of Fluent, CFX, Star CD, etc.)?

Why should I spend $k's on CFX when there are a number of low costs packages which claim to do the same thing for much less money?

(Note i use CFX and am perfectly happy with it but this question gets asked of me - and I don't have a full answer in response...)
  Reply With Quote

Old   December 17, 2007, 07:07
Default Re: CFX vs 'cheap cfd packages'
  #2
Bart Prast
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
General purpose CFD packages such as CFX, STAR, Fluent contain a whole range of models you might not need. You can skip the whole multiphase modelling for instance. But the license of (at least) CFX is modular. If you only need CAD interface/import, meshing, turbulence models, serial (not parallel), you might end up with a stripped, cheaper, license. But whether that's cheaper than a FLAIR I don't know. I do now that a lot of development is put into the turbulence models of CFX, whether the same holds for packages such as FLAIR....
  Reply With Quote

Old   December 17, 2007, 10:47
Default Re: CFX vs 'cheap cfd packages'
  #3
Andrew
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Thanks for the response - my CFX licenses are quite 'stripped down'. I'm hoping someone will be able to provide me with a good comeback as to the merits of CFX vs say IES microflo or flair.

Put it this way - if i charge $x for my work using cfx and my competitor is chargin $y for his using ies microflow... how do i convince my client they should go with me (and cfx...)?
  Reply With Quote

Old   December 17, 2007, 11:10
Default Re: CFX vs 'cheap cfd packages'
  #4
opaque
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Dear Andrew,

These days is very easy to put together a "cheap CFD" package to solve flow in a box, and fairly Cartesian friendly geometry. The problem is to offer:

1 - A variety of tested/validated physical models to approach your modeling needs.

2 - Solution algorithms that are scalable, that allow you to predict the turn around time for your calculation.

3 - Reliable technical support on a wide spectrum of physical models.

The flyer for Microflow is very light on technical information. I do not know what is under the hood in regard to discretization algorithms, linear solver technology, validation of physical models, scalability for large models, parallel computing.

You will have to contact them directly, a setup a real configuration case you have done in CFX, and let see what it takes them to provide you with something useful to you.

Opaque

  Reply With Quote

Old   December 17, 2007, 17:20
Default Re: CFX vs 'cheap cfd packages'
  #5
Glenn Horrocks
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi,

As for selling the more expensive option to clients - I suggest you do a relevant benchmark simulation on CFX and Microflow/Flair/Whatever. Pretty much every CFD simulation code I know offers free trials so hopefully this will only require a little investment in time.

If the benchmark shows that CFX is more accurate or captures physics the others don't then you have something to justify the extra cost. If not then I guess you had better start moving to the cheaper code!

(BTW: I have just been quoted for my next year's lease of my ANSYS/CFX software and it is a 35% price increase on last year. I might start also start looking for cheaper options with price increases like that. Not happy.)

Regards, Glenn Horrocks
  Reply With Quote

Old   December 19, 2007, 05:33
Default Re: CFX vs 'cheap cfd packages'
  #6
Bart Prast
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
So we finally feel the 'benefits' of one major CFD player in the market?

Bart
  Reply With Quote

Old   December 20, 2007, 18:10
Default Re: CFX vs 'cheap cfd packages'
  #7
Glenn Horrocks
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi Bart,

I assume you are referring to the 35% price increase I have just been quoted. I have asked for the justification for the increase - we will see what they come back with.

In the meantime I will have a look at the alternatives. The CFD market has broadened considerably in recent years and there is quite a large number of good alternatives out there.

Glenn Horrocks
  Reply With Quote

Old   December 21, 2007, 12:00
Default Re: CFX vs 'cheap cfd packages'
  #8
Bart Prast
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
You will be missed in the Ansys CFX community :,-(

But all is not lost, just fine-tune your bargaining skills
  Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How to import..Catia model to CFD. and CFD to CFX Sergi CFX 3 February 7, 2006 16:33
Need cheap CFD program for HVAC applications Phillip Mieszkowski Main CFD Forum 1 October 5, 2005 08:28
CFD for fans & blower housings David Carroll Main CFD Forum 8 August 24, 2000 17:25
CFD Design...The CFD Future John C. Chien Main CFD Forum 19 October 6, 1999 11:57
PC vs. Workstation Tim Franke Main CFD Forum 5 September 29, 1999 15:01


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:40.