# Tubulent flow@ RE50,000 error

 User Name Remember Me Password
 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 January 24, 2008, 04:28 Tubulent flow@ RE50,000 error #1 Tony Guest   Posts: n/a HI, I would like to have a simple analysis for a smooth pipe using ANSYS CFD/CFX software. The parameters as follow: RE=50000 fluid density=997 (water) Diameter=0.048m dynamic viscosity=0.0008899 (water) Length=3m and from the equation RE =(fluid density) * (Diameter) * (Mean velocity)/(Dynamic viscosity) and Hence, we get the mean velocity as 0.93m/s. We input the fully development profile(FDP) equation into the expression as follow: FDP=Maximum velocity * (1 - (r/Rad))^(1/6.76) the inlet we using the FDP as normal speed the domain we using the k-epsilon which k is 0.00888 and epsilon is 0.0495. The intensity (I) is 0.041376. the outlet we using the pressure = 0Pa. However, we get the solution from the CFX post as follow: the pressure gradient is around 262 Pa. Compare with the Darcy-Weisbach equation, the pressure gradient is 186.47 Pa. How can I reduce the percentage error between CFX result and theoretical result???? Many thanks

 January 24, 2008, 17:30 Re: Tubulent flow@ RE50,000 error #2 Glenn Horrocks Guest   Posts: n/a Hi, The first thing to check is mesh refinement. Check your mesh is fine enough. Glenn Horrocks

 January 25, 2008, 00:30 Re: Tubulent flow@ RE50,000 error #3 Tony Guest   Posts: n/a Hi, thanks for your answering~ how to define the mesh is fine enough??? I tailor-made the centre of the pipe have more mesh...(the grids size is much smaller than grids near the pipe wall)... since the pressure gradient is seem at the centre of pipe along the pipe. However, I have the same result. Moreover, I would like to know the different between SST, K-epilson, BSL & SSG ?? The data input (the value of k, epsilon) at the inlet is the same or different with the different analysis (e.g. Shear Stress Transfer (SST), K-epsilon)?

 January 28, 2008, 18:23 Re: Tubulent flow@ RE50,000 error #4 Glenn Horrocks Guest   Posts: n/a Hi, The mesh at the wall is much more important than the internal mesh. It is the refinement of the wall mesh which will determine the accuracy of your simulation. Do a search on this forum on mesh sensitivity check. It has been discussed several times. Glenn Horrocks

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post Diego Main CFD Forum 17 December 21, 2014 02:40 ata OpenFOAM Installation 42 May 14, 2012 20:48 vaina74 OpenFOAM Installation 13 February 3, 2012 18:43 padmanathan OpenFOAM 9 October 13, 2009 05:17 cfduser CFX 0 April 29, 2006 10:58

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 18:44.

 Contact Us - CFD Online - Top