CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > CFX

how 2 freeze 1 phase flow field & start lagrangian

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   February 12, 2008, 15:38
Default how 2 freeze 1 phase flow field & start lagrangian
  #1
KK
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I solved single phase flow field with LES and now I want to inject particles of different sizes.

Is there any way to 'freeze' single phase flow field and track the particles of different types? By freezing I mean that I want to stop solving single phase flow field (carrier fluid) and use that flow field to track my particles. It will save my computational time.
  Reply With Quote

Old   February 12, 2008, 17:33
Default Re: how 2 freeze 1 phase flow field & start lagran
  #2
Glenn Horrocks
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi,

Yes, this can be done. Set up a simulation with 0 set as the maximum iterations (or you might need to do one iteration just to keep it happy) and do an uncoupled particle tracking on the result of that.

Alternately you can stop the solution of various solvers (eg Velocity/pressure, enthalpy, scalars, turbulence) individually using expert parameters.

Glenn Horrocks
  Reply With Quote

Old   February 12, 2008, 18:31
Default One clarification please
  #3
KK
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Thank you Glenn.

In first approach, did you ask me to define maximum time steps? (I am doing LES and hence transient). Or does it mean zero (or one) iteration in steady state solver taking solution from LES as initial guess?

In short, I am confused 'iteration' Vs 'time step'. Please clarify.
  Reply With Quote

Old   February 13, 2008, 17:24
Default Re: One clarification please
  #4
Glenn Horrocks
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi,

If you just want a particle track based on a frozen flow field from an LES simulation, do a steady state simulation with zero iterations and uncoupled particle tracking. I think this should work.

Glenn Horrocks
  Reply With Quote

Old   February 13, 2008, 17:40
Default Re: One clarification please
  #5
KK
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Thank you very much Glenn. I will give it a try.

By the way, I can imagine that liquid-solid particle simulation with Eulerian-Eulerian approach with LES model would be extremly costly in terms of computational resources. (Assuming we have variety of particle's sizes)

Do people do these type of simulations? Or is it not feasible at all to do in terms of time consumed?

I will be thankful to you for any of your comments on it.
  Reply With Quote

Old   February 14, 2008, 17:48
Default Re: One clarification please
  #6
Glenn Horrocks
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi,

Yes, multiphase modelling will significantly increase the cost of an LES mode. The expense of a LES model is also strongly dependant on the Re of the flow. Low Re are not too bad as the turbulent eddies you have to resolve are large. For high Re flow you need much greater resolution. This is the primary factor influencing the size of an LES simulation.

Whether it is feasible depends on how big a simulation you need to run to get useful results, how big a computer you have access to and how long is your patience.

Glenn Horrocks
  Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
alphaEqn.H in twoPhaseEulerFoam cheng1988sjtu OpenFOAM Bugs 14 September 18, 2011 13:46
problems after decomposing for running alessio.nz OpenFOAM 5 April 20, 2011 08:44
Disturbed flow field at outlet boundary (Multiphase flow through pipe) Michiel CFX 17 April 21, 2010 10:14
low speed compressible two phase flow?? cat CFX 0 November 15, 2005 08:59
LES on two phase flow Li Yang Main CFD Forum 0 May 12, 2004 08:10


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:56.