# outflow BC

 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 February 26, 2008, 12:17 outflow BC #1 selim Guest   Posts: n/a Hi, In Fluent there is outflow BC. I couldnt find the equivalance of this in CFX? Any help? Thanks, ---Selim

 February 26, 2008, 12:50 Re: outflow BC #2 Fusion Guest   Posts: n/a I don't know how Fluent works, whoever in CFX there are 2 type of outlet BC: "outlet", which simply allows the fluid to exit from your domain; and "opening", which allows the flow to re-enter into your domain also. The latter is preferrable since the former, having particular pressure distributions at the surface, imposes a "wall" condition to the cells in which the flow are sucted into your domain, thus creating a partly obstructed outlet surface (unphysical behaviour).

 February 26, 2008, 17:36 Re: outflow BC #3 Glenn Horrocks Guest   Posts: n/a Hi, I would not say in general that an opening is preferable to an outlet. If a boundary could have flow in both directions then an opening is required. However, if flow is only out of the boundary (or if a small region of backflow is present but it is not important to the results) then an outlet is preferable as they tend to be more numerically stable and converge faster. Regards, Glenn Horrocks

 February 26, 2008, 19:27 Re: outflow BC #4 Rogerio Fernandes Brito Guest   Posts: n/a It depends on the situation. I use openning to not use wall, because i wanna simulate a small region, īcause i donīt have a fast personal computer, neither a distributed simulation!

 February 27, 2008, 04:29 Re: outflow BC #5 Subha Guest   Posts: n/a Hai Glenn, When we have a new problem, how can we conclude that the boundary has a flow, only in one direction or both? I simulated a flow in which I used a '0 Pa' static pressure outlet. After some steps I had a warning saying that there are reverse flows in my domain. Then I had to change it Opening. Is this the only method to know whether this boundary has reverse flows or not? Regards, Subha.

 February 27, 2008, 17:50 Re: outflow BC #6 Glenn Horrocks Guest   Posts: n/a Hi, You can always look in CFX-Post to see the reverse flows. As I said previously, the reverse flows and artificial walls at outlets are not necessarily bad, providing they are not significantly influencing results. In fact the additional numerical stability they have is very useful. Glenn Horrocks

 March 1, 2008, 11:02 Re: outflow BC #7 Hekler Guest   Posts: n/a This is an extrapolated condition in fluent. The equivalent in CFx is a supersonic outlet. This is only available for compressible flows. For incompressibl just set a pressure outlet and switch it to a supersonic outlet in the command editor.

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post Mizerable Main CFD Forum 4 August 22, 2011 13:00 sErik OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 1 November 18, 2009 12:10 Subhra Datta Main CFD Forum 2 November 24, 2003 14:11 dallybird Main CFD Forum 0 March 6, 2003 12:55 Romuald Skoda Main CFD Forum 3 August 6, 1999 03:08

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 13:59.