|
[Sponsors] | |||||
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi, I am solving a heat transfer through multidomain system (2D) in CFX. Temperature boundary conditions T1 and T2 are applied on 2 boundaries, remaining boundaries are adiabatic. All properties do not depend on temperature. The problem is that in case of large value T2-T1 there is good agreement between heat flux in and heat flux out but in case of smaller T2-T1 solution does not converge and heat flux in is different from heat flux out? Are there floating point values used by CFX during the calculation process (I hope)? What can be a reason for un-physical solution in case of small temperature gradients 0.0001 K /m ?
|
|
|
||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Temperature gradient macros on face | qwerty753 | Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming | 5 | March 12, 2013 08:20 |
| Poor convergence with temperature dependent density on modified pisoFOAM | ovie | OpenFOAM | 1 | March 20, 2011 04:19 |
| Calculation of the Governing Equations | Mihail | CFX | 5 | July 25, 2008 17:29 |
| natural convection with high temperature gradient? | phsieh2005 | Main CFD Forum | 4 | December 19, 2007 06:25 |
| Temperature gradient | Michal | FLUENT | 7 | December 3, 2001 11:24 |