|
[Sponsors] |
March 5, 2008, 17:35 |
turbine 2 ?
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi
i'm doing a radial turbine simulation with the K_eps as a turbulence model ,the probleme is that my actual hardware is not as that,this is why i'm using 5 inflation layers to keep low the elements number ,is it enough to get accurate results,and my seconde question ,in which region i should use a small mesh? the more important question is ,when i'm trying to get a good mesh ,how i should manage this process,it means ;starting from let us say any mesh ,how could i know the problem region and correct the mesh there? expecting a response from Glenn thanks |
|
March 6, 2008, 16:44 |
Re: turbine 2 ?
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi,
Read the CFX documentation about accuracy of simulations and the best practises guide for turbo machinery. After that read some general stuff on CFD accuracy - "Computational Fluid Dynamics" by Roache has a thorough discussion about CFD accuracy. Also the Journal of Fluids Engineering have an editorial policy on numerical accuracy which is well worth taking note: http://journaltool.asme.org/Template...umAccuracy.pdf Other references to look at include http://www.grc.nasa.gov/WWW/wind/val.../tutorial.html Glenn Horrocks |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Problem with torque output from a turbine simulation. | pa-dundas | FLUENT | 5 | July 17, 2022 05:27 |
FSI - Wind Turbine | AUN | CFX | 13 | August 29, 2012 16:44 |
Sliding mesh vs MRF in axial turbine simulation | Vito | FLUENT | 3 | December 21, 2011 04:57 |
Meshing Volume in Gambit for a water turbine | Zaqie | FLUENT | 1 | July 24, 2009 01:25 |
turbine noise | naser | FLUENT | 0 | December 3, 2004 13:37 |