|
[Sponsors] | |||||
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hello All,
Convergence for the steady state simulations can be obtained by decreasing the 'false time step'. Keeping the default RMS convergence criteria (10^-4) for the steady state simululation, convergence in my simulation became difficult to achieve after a while and hence I changed the 'Timescale Factor' from 1 to 0.01 [in the pannel Solver Control -> Basic Settings -> Convergence Control ->Fluid Timescale Control]. It resulted in decreasing the auto time scale from 2*10^-2 to 2*10^-4 and I achieved the convergence. I do not have a understanding of how the steady solver works (using a 'false' time step)? Could you please help me in understanding the affect/effect of high/low false time step on the accuracy of results. And what convergence criteria should I use for the problems like cyclone? With very kind regards, Kushagra |
|
|
||
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi,
How timestepping works is described in the documentation. As for what convergence criteria you need, that is problem dependant and you should do a sensitivity study to check it. There is also a guide on convergence levels in the documentation. Glenn Horrocks |
|
|
||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Floating point exception error | Alan | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 10 | April 6, 2012 14:02 |
| Time step, Number of time step, Maxximum Iterations per time step | sandisk | FLUENT | 0 | July 18, 2011 02:57 |
| IcoFoam parallel woes | msrinath80 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 9 | July 22, 2007 02:58 |
| False time step factors | Jesper Laursen | Main CFD Forum | 4 | June 4, 2002 04:35 |
| unsteady calcs in FLUENT | Sanjay Padhiar | Main CFD Forum | 1 | March 31, 1999 11:32 |