|
[Sponsors] | |||||
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi all,
i'm still confuse on aspect ratio defination. In few publised papers define the aspect ratio as (Height/width) but in other paper used hydraulic (diameter/channel lenght). So which one is the correct one? thank you for you time. |
|
|
||
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi,
You can define it to be whatever is relevant to your situation. As you have noticed, when a paper talks about aspect ratio you have to be careful to understand exactly how they have defined it as it varies between authors. Glenn Horrocks |
|
|
||
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
thank you Glenn
viel spass |
|
|
||
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I used to use Height/width or (H/L).
Take a look yourself: http://200.131.186.194/phl/pdf/0029662.pdf |
|
|
||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| pressure eq. "converges" after few time steps | maddalena | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 69 | July 21, 2011 07:42 |
| aspect ratio vs. y+ | hammam | CFX | 3 | August 6, 2007 10:41 |
| High Aspect Ratio elements | Flavio | CFX | 2 | November 24, 2006 12:01 |
| does aspect ratio affect analysis | mahesh | Main CFD Forum | 2 | October 10, 2005 09:12 |
| Aspect Ratio at high turbulent and swirled flows | zago | FLUENT | 0 | May 19, 2004 02:37 |