CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > CFX

CFX vs. FLUENT in multiphase models

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   October 29, 2008, 06:44
Default CFX vs. FLUENT in multiphase models
  #1
Hossam
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
i am a FLUENT user who faced a problem in FLUENT, and i wonder if CFX can provide a solution.

i am using the Eulerian-Eulerian multiphase model to model the atomization characteristics of an airblast atomizer. the problem is FLUENT does not provide a mean to calculate the SMD of the droplets unless the lagrangian approach is used which is not appropiate for my problem.

the question is : can CFX provide a mean to calculate the SMD of the droplets (or any characteristic diameter) using the Eulerian approach ?

thanks in advance
  Reply With Quote

Old   November 3, 2010, 07:57
Red face
  #2
New Member
 
Navid Sharifi
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Iran, Tehran
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 6
n.sharifi is on a distinguished road
please clarify your application , is the material water or steam? if your problem engages with wetness condition of steam in multiphase modeling,i suggest you read this manual: steam jet tutorial in CFX . excuse me if my offer not applicable for you.
n.sharifi is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Reynolds Stress model in CFX vs Fluent Tim CFX 1 October 7, 2009 06:19
OpenFOAM vs. Fluent & CFX marco Main CFD Forum 81 March 31, 2009 14:22
Fluent and CFX Ale Main CFD Forum 7 July 30, 2008 21:14
Fluent and CFX Ale CFX 1 July 2, 2008 18:19
Jobs in cfd - fluent or cfx? jobman Main CFD Forum 6 July 5, 2006 15:02


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:44.