CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > CFX

VOF Lagrangian Interface Tracking

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   November 4, 2008, 17:27
Default VOF Lagrangian Interface Tracking
  #1
Kam
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hello,

I am modeling a solidification problem. Initially a tank is filled with water, and there is a cold plate on the top to solidify the water (due to radiation). I can model this without too much problem, however from experiment I know the solid later created on top of water has a thickness of order 10 micron. VOF and Eulerian interface (water/ice) is not appropriate since I will have cells that are partially filled with water and ice, so no matter how small the mesh can get (before round off errors mess it up), the ice thickness is not going to be correct. So I think the only way to take care this problem is to be able to track the fluid surface using a Lagrangian tracking method, i.e. the mesh on the interface will be refined so that no cells cross the interface. Now here is the questions. Is it possible to do it in CFX? I have also thought about adding my own user function to do this, it will be complicated but not impossible.

Any comments would be much appreciated.

Kam
  Reply With Quote

Old   November 4, 2008, 19:09
Default Re: VOF Lagrangian Interface Tracking
  #2
Glenn Horrocks
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi,

What are you trying to look at with the simulation? Do you need CHT in the ice? Do you need to model the ice at all, can you use a moving top boundary with a mass sink?

Regards, Glenn Horrocks
  Reply With Quote

Old   November 4, 2008, 19:24
Default Re: VOF Lagrangian Interface Tracking
  #3
Kam
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Glenn, My ultimate goal is to control the thickness of the ice. At this time I am using a highly viscous fluid as ice (mu = 100 Pa.s). So essentially two fluids in the model but one (ice) doesn't move because of high viscosity. I find the bulk temperature in a cell and when it is below 0[C] I change the viscosity in that cell to 100 Pa.s (convert it to ice). I don't care about the temprature gradient inside the ice layer at this time. What I care is when I convert water to ice in a cell, I like that cell to be full of water instead of partially water/ice. Is it more clear?

What do you mean by "moving top boundary with a mass sink"? If I understand it correctly, the cells that I am going to add the mass sink will still be partially water/ice, so what would be different from my current approach?

Thanks for your time. Kam
  Reply With Quote

Old   November 5, 2008, 19:08
Default Re: VOF Lagrangian Interface Tracking
  #4
Glenn Horrocks
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi,

I was suggesting you only model the liquid part and define the top boundary as the ice level. The top boundary moves up and down according to the bottom level of the ice.

Whether this is appropriate or not will depend on exactly what you are trying to get out of the analysis.

Glenn Horrocks
  Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Wind turbine simulation Saturn CFX 34 October 16, 2014 05:27
VOF Interface Tracking Algorithm CFDtoy FLUENT 4 August 5, 2010 04:41
RPM in Wind Turbine Pankaj CFX 9 November 23, 2009 05:05
tracking of interface in VOF amit FLUENT 0 July 20, 2006 18:50
Replace periodic by inlet-outlet pair lego CFX 3 November 5, 2002 21:09


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:21.