CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > CFX

mesh quality to CFX

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By CycLone

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   December 2, 2008, 01:27
Default mesh quality to CFX
  #1
thiagu
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi all, Can any tell about TET and Prism mesh minimum quality criteria (such as Aspect ratio &hellip to export to CFX solver from Hypermesh.

thanks in advance
  Reply With Quote

Old   December 2, 2008, 11:18
Default Re: mesh quality to CFX
  #2
CycLone
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Look up mesh quality in the CFX documentation (ANSYS CFX-Solver Modeling Guide | Advice on Flow Modeling | Mesh Issues | ).
  Reply With Quote

Old   December 3, 2008, 06:44
Default Re: mesh quality to CFX
  #3
Georg
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
It's interesting theme. Would you mind if I add my question? What ICEM quality criterion should be used first for elements' smoothing? This mesh is for CFX modeling. I heard ICEM criterion "Quality" is main quality characteristic for Fluent. Is there similar ICEM criterion(s) for vertex centered CFX solver? And what is reasonable interval of it? Please share your experience. Thanks for replies.

  Reply With Quote

Old   December 4, 2008, 00:21
Default Re: mesh quality to CFX
  #4
CycLone
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Really, the same criterion apply. Only FLUENT is more sensitive to mesh quality than CFX (because the vertex centered control volumes are effectively polyhedral elements). The main things to avoid are:

1. Sudden mesh expansion (i.e. high volume ratio), 2. Highly skewed elements (look at dihedral angle, which is the angle between two faces, as opposed to face angle, which is the angle at the corner of a face between two edges), 3. Clusters of poor quality elements.

As a general bit of advice, don't spend too much time smoothing and fixing your mesh. If the mesh needs that much smoothing or repair you are better off going back and fixing the mesh controls that led to the problem. Include sufficient resolution in areas of high geometric complexity or, if the region is not important, remove the complex features.

If you are using Hexa, focus on the quality of the blocks. Hexa offers tremendous flexibility for creating hex meshes, but if a poor quality block will result in many poor quality elements. Individually these may not affect you convergence or solution, but collectively they will wreak havoc. If you can't ensure the block quality, make it a swept or unstructured block and move on. There is no point in wasting 8 hours perfecting a mesh that is only saving you 2 hours of run time .

Lastly, check out Workbench meshing too. You'd be surprised how good it is and it is especially good when it comes to changes in geometry. Workbench meshing allows you to update your geometry while maintaining your mesh controls. Most of the time you can just update the geometry and regenerate the mesh without having to do any re-work!

-CycLone

MGabr likes this.
  Reply With Quote

Old   December 4, 2008, 01:55
Default Re: mesh quality to CFX
  #5
Georg
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Thanks a lot CycLone for your comprehensive answer! Georg
  Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[ICEM] CGNS mesh failing in CFX siw ANSYS Meshing & Geometry 4 March 14, 2011 14:53
simulating 2D airfoil mesh in CFX iffy ANSYS Meshing & Geometry 6 March 9, 2011 04:53
increasing mesh quality is leading to poor convergence tippo CFX 2 May 5, 2009 10:55
hex mesh using cfx mesh. mehul CFX 3 December 12, 2005 23:06
Gambit problems Althea FLUENT 21 February 6, 2001 08:05


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:20.