CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > CFX

Outlet Problem

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   April 8, 2009, 16:04
Default Outlet Problem
  #1
New Member
 
Faraaz
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 11
Rep Power: 8
cfxuser1 is on a distinguished road
Hi everybody. I am simulating a flow around a body and am getting the error message below. I do not really understand why I am getting this error. Can anybody please help me understand that.
Thanks.
Faraaz

-------------------------------------------------------------------+
| ****** Notice ****** |
| A wall has been placed at portion(s) of an OUTLET |
| boundary condition (at 52.0% of the faces, 51.6% of the area) |
| to prevent fluid from flowing into the domain. |
| The boundary condition name is: Outlet. |
| The fluid name is: Air at 25 C. |
| If this situation persists, consider switching |
| to an Opening type boundary condition instead. |
+--------------------------------------------------------------------+

+--------------------------------------------------------------------+
| ERROR #001100279 has occurred in subroutine ErrAction. |
| Message: |
| Floating point exception: Overflow |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
+--------------------------------------------------------------------+
cfxuser1 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 8, 2009, 18:56
Default
  #2
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 10,646
Rep Power: 84
ghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura about
Hi,

The first message says you have reverse flow at that outlet. It is only a warning, this is not always a problem.

The second is an overflow error, the simulation has diverged.

Glenn Horrocks
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 9, 2009, 09:25
Default outlet problem
  #3
Senior Member
 
Bharath kumar
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 157
Rep Power: 8
bharath is on a distinguished road
hi,
try this.
first change the boundary condition to opening.then try.
if it is not successful then check ur mesh quality.it may have negative elements. or use some coarse mesh.check ur boundary conditions too
bharath is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 9, 2009, 15:51
Default
  #4
New Member
 
Faraaz
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 11
Rep Power: 8
cfxuser1 is on a distinguished road
Hi,

Thanks guys for helping. Yes I am trying some stuff right now. If there's any problem, I will let you guys know.
cfxuser1 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 10, 2009, 12:02
Default
  #5
New Member
 
Michael
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 19
Rep Power: 8
Chilli83 is on a distinguished road
Hi all

I have the same problem but also two other questions.

1)
How can I be sure that there will be no inflow in a opening as bc for outlet?

2)
Also what would be the most "correct" way to define/assume the temperature at the outlet?

I have used a subroutine to calculate the average temperature for my outlet region since i thougt this was smart to do.

kind regards
Michael
Chilli83 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 11, 2009, 08:47
Default
  #6
Senior Member
 
Bharath kumar
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 157
Rep Power: 8
bharath is on a distinguished road
hi,
1) check your areaave,massave variables at opening.if the deviation between variables are high then there may be inflow.

2) could u explain ur problem further more detail?
bharath is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 11, 2009, 08:59
Default
  #7
New Member
 
Michael
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 19
Rep Power: 8
Chilli83 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by bharath View Post
hi,
1) check your areaave,massave variables at opening.if the deviation between variables are high then there may be inflow.

2) could u explain ur problem further more detail?
Hi bbarath

The problem is that when I define a opening a temperature at the opening is nessecary. So by the subroutine the program calculate a average temperature for the region I have define as the outlet. I am in doubt if this is the right way to set the temperature or is I just could type in a given temperature?

kind regards
Michael
Chilli83 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 11, 2009, 11:15
Default
  #8
Senior Member
 
Bharath kumar
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 157
Rep Power: 8
bharath is on a distinguished road
you just set the opening temperature as an approximate guessed one.when solving the problem, solver will fix the temperature.
bharath is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 15, 2009, 06:50
Default
  #9
New Member
 
Tassi
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Mumbai, India
Posts: 11
Rep Power: 8
Tassi is on a distinguished road
Hi Michael

Your method for defining the temperature at Opening is correct. Wall generation at Outlet can signify many things. See the CFX documentation on setting boundary conditions.

BOL

Tassi
Tassi is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 15, 2009, 07:22
Default
  #10
New Member
 
Michael
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 19
Rep Power: 8
Chilli83 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tassi View Post
Hi Michael

Your method for defining the temperature at Opening is correct. Wall generation at Outlet can signify many things. See the CFX documentation on setting boundary conditions.

BOL

Tassi
Hi Tassi.

I think the reason why the solver creates artificial walls is caused by a recirculation zone. So i thougth that it would be appropriate to model the outlet as an opening to avoid numerical error caused be a wrong pressure field.
I have added i screendump of my model where the inlets and outlet region is illustrated. The 3D blocks are persons. It is the region below the 3D blocks the recirculation zone is expected and here the solver creates artificial walls.



Kind regards
Michael
Chilli83 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 15, 2009, 21:04
Default
  #11
Senior Member
 
Bharath kumar
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 157
Rep Power: 8
bharath is on a distinguished road
hi Michael,
i have a doubt on the simulation. Even if you give the outlet as opening, whether the artificial wall created?
bharath is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 16, 2009, 00:27
Default
  #12
New Member
 
Tassi
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Mumbai, India
Posts: 11
Rep Power: 8
Tassi is on a distinguished road
Hi Michael
Yes the solver creates artificial wall cause of recerculation.
You can deactivate solver from creating wall at boundaries by deactivating the function in expert parameters in Pre. Hasn't been of much help though.
Normally I solve such problem by extending the outlet a little away from such recirculations. Sometimes adjusting mesh size and decreasing timesteps have helped.

BOL

Tassi
Tassi is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
outlet boundary condition Nina Schiepel CFX 2 July 12, 2008 15:27
Convergence problem of the energy equation Woo Meng Wai FLUENT 2 May 13, 2008 03:06
pressure outlet BC for Boussinesq with Fluent stephane Main CFD Forum 1 October 20, 2007 07:09
Problem with the pressure outlet sami FLUENT 6 July 11, 2007 17:33
Is this problem well posed? Thomas P. Abraham Main CFD Forum 5 September 8, 1999 14:52


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:13.