CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > CFX

Vof in CFX ?

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   April 11, 2009, 08:03
Default Vof in CFX ?
  #1
New Member
 
Asghar
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 16
Rep Power: 8
bohluly is on a distinguished road
Hi All
is there any VOF module for sharp interface modeling in CFX ?
if yes, witch method it use (PLIC or SLIC ....)
"my mean is not only two phase model but exactly VOF and sharp interface modeling"
bohluly is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 13, 2009, 21:26
Default
  #2
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 10,824
Rep Power: 85
ghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura about
Hi,

CFX has a compressive differencing scheme for free surface simulations, but despite the rantings in the CFX advertising material it is far behind the free surface schemes in Fluent and other codes. You have to expect the interface to be smeared over several cells in CFX at best.

CFX does not have SLIC or PLIC.

Glenn Horrocks
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 14, 2009, 08:34
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 8
latslosh is on a distinguished road
Hi,

Depending on what the flow is doing, you're looking at a free surface 'thickness' of usually 1.5-2 mesh diagonals with CFX. So the only interface sharpening option available is refining the mesh...

latslosh.
latslosh is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 14, 2009, 20:43
Default
  #4
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 10,824
Rep Power: 85
ghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura about
Hi,

A free surface of 1.5-2 mesh diagonals in my experience is only possible for a tightly converged simulation with fine time steps. If you loosen the convergence or use bigger timesteps to accelerate the simulation you will blur the surface more.

Note surface tension makes free surface modelling significantly more complicated.

Glenn Horrocks
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 15, 2009, 07:12
Default
  #5
New Member
 
Asghar
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 16
Rep Power: 8
bohluly is on a distinguished road
Tanks,

I saw some results of CFX that it can not save the sharp interface (for example in Slug flow modeling).
In some manuals of CFX presented that CFX has VOF module, but I think it is not correct, VOF basically must save the sharp interface by spacially methods such as Youngs method.
bohluly is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 15, 2009, 18:38
Default
  #6
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 10,824
Rep Power: 85
ghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura about
Hi,

You should not generalise Ashgar. There is nothing "wrong" with the free surface modelling in CFX, it is just that it does not capture the interface as sharply as some other approaches. Whether this is a problem or not depends on the application. CFX has been successfully used on many free surface applications so you definitely would not say it is "wrong".

Glenn Horrocks
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 16, 2009, 01:55
Default
  #7
New Member
 
Asghar
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 16
Rep Power: 8
bohluly is on a distinguished road
That is ok !
My mean was that the free surface model of CFX is not VOF and it make some mass diffusion that it may damage physically on results for some application, for example in wave modeling we don't have any mass diffusion between air and water, when CFX make a tin or tick layer of fluid with density of 500 between air with density of 1 and water with density of 1000 it is harmful for momentum eq. But when we have phisicaly some mixed condition in free surface it is so usfull.
bohluly is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Pros and Cons for CFX, CFdesign, COMSOL Val Main CFD Forum 3 June 10, 2011 02:20
Open boundary condition for VOF in CFX Zhihua Xie CFX 2 June 4, 2007 10:48
PhD using CFX Rui CFX 9 May 28, 2007 05:59
CFX 4.4 installation problem Pandu Sattvika CFX 1 December 1, 2001 05:07
Moving mesh or VOF? Giovanni Main CFD Forum 16 September 24, 2001 08:25


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:03.