# stopping and re-starting moving mesh for static lift coefficients

 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 April 20, 2009, 05:19 stopping and re-starting moving mesh for static lift coefficients #1 New Member   Tim B Join Date: Apr 2009 Posts: 11 Rep Power: 8 I'd like to calculate the static lift, moment and drag coefficients for various angles of incidence. I created one model with a moving mesh but how do I make that transient model a stationary one within the run-time environment? Or do I need to create individual models and do separate runs for each angle of incidence?

 April 20, 2009, 18:42 #2 Super Moderator   Glenn Horrocks Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Sydney, Australia Posts: 10,646 Rep Power: 84 Hi, Using moving mesh to do various AOA is a very complicated way of doing it. Just change the angle of incidence at the inlet boundary. If it is a simple steady case then use a simple steady model. Glenn Horrocks

 April 21, 2009, 06:18 #3 New Member   Tim B Join Date: Apr 2009 Posts: 11 Rep Power: 8 Thanks Glenn, I have a moving anyway for the transient runs, besides the model actually changes with various AOA (actively controlled), that's why I'd like to use the moving mesh method. Just wondered whether I could obtain the stationary results by stopping and restarting the run and if so, how? Couldn't find anything in the manual re this.

 April 21, 2009, 07:16 #4 Super Moderator   Glenn Horrocks Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Sydney, Australia Posts: 10,646 Rep Power: 84 Hi, You can't use moving mesh in steady state runs. Also I don't think you can move a mesh to a position and use that mesh for a steady state run. You would only bother doing a moving mesh simulation of what you are doing if the flow timescales are similar to the wing motion timescales. If the wing is much slower than the air it can be accurately modelled as a series of steady state models at the various positions. Glenn Horrocks

 April 27, 2009, 16:05 #5 Member   Tristan Burton Join Date: Mar 2009 Posts: 43 Rep Power: 8 We have done some moving mesh simulations to get "steady-state" port discharge coefficients as the ports are closed. Rather than generate a sequence of meshes and run them steady-state one at a time, we did a moving mesh transient simulation where the ports closed very slowly. In order to make sure our results were "steady-state", we did a 2nd run where it took twice as long to close the ports. A comparison of the two runs showed no difference between them until the ports were nearly closed. I doubt that this was the most efficient way to solve the problem but it sounds like it might be an option for you. Tristan

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:41.