|
[Sponsors] | |||||
|
|
|
#1 |
|
New Member
Mike Jenkins
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 9
Rep Power: 6 ![]() |
What is the consensus opinion on how to calculate leakage through an area? I have tried calculating the cross sectional area and then multiplying by a measured velocity point in that area but since some areas are high proportionally to the rest of the area, the answer is not correct.
I have also tried graphing flow but it is not always constant in the areas either. Is there a way to calculate average velocity of an area or something and then multiply by the area? Any other suggestions are welcome. I am trying to calculate a leakage rate through a crack. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
New Member
Mike Jenkins
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 9
Rep Power: 6 ![]() |
also see this forum I posted to calculate the velocity:
Leakage through a small clearance crack. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 7,133
Rep Power: 60 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Hi,
In CFX you should use the massFlow() CEL expression to calculate the mass flows. Then it will correctly account for the integration points which your simple area times velocity approach does not. In most cases the difference should be small though. Glenn Horrocks |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
New Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
Hi,
If you create a 2D region at this area, you should be able to calculate the area averaged massflow through this area in CFX post. You need to create a table, then what you should enter is areaAve(massflow) @ (region) Delali |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 7,133
Rep Power: 60 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Hi,
I suspect he is looking for the total mass flow, not the massflow per cell. In this case you don't use the areaAve() function, but should use the massFlow() function instead. Glenn Horrocks |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
New Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 6 ![]() |
Quote:
To created a 2D region in CFX Post? I also want to get flow rate through a section of a tunnel, but I did not figure out how to make a 2D region at a section interested without including the flow outside of the tunnel. Thanks Ahlo |
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 7,133
Rep Power: 60 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Hi,
A plane can be defined to have bounds. Have you tried that? And as I mentioned previously use the massFlow() function to get the massflow directly on your surface. Glenn Horrocks |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member
Jules Bell
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 31
Rep Power: 6 ![]() |
Hi,
I have pretty much the same problem. I have a fluidic actuator cavity that is connected to the outside flow with a thin slit, as can be seen in the attached picture. One wall of the cavity is moving (piezo disc), so there is flow going back and forth through the slit. I would like to monitor the mass flow (in fact, the average velocity) and would like to use a CEL expression for that. However, there is no region defined that crosses the slit. Is it possible to create a plane that crosses the slit in CFX Pre? Or do I have to define it in ICEM when creating the mesh? Doing it later in Post isn't really what I like, because then I can't monitor the expression during the solver run. Thanks for your help! Jules |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 7,133
Rep Power: 60 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Hi,
I think you can do this in V12 but I am not sure. In V11 or earlier you have to cut the mesh and reconnect it with an interface, preferably with a 1:1 connection. Then you have a surface to calculate the massflow rate on. Alternately you can define a monitor point in the middle of the passage and monitor the velocity. Of course this is not the mass flow but sometimes it is enough and you don't need to remesh this way. Glenn Horrocks |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
New Member
Mike Jenkins
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 9
Rep Power: 6 ![]() |
I have found that the best solution for my particular problem is quite obvious...
![]() I used the massflow calculator as suggested to get the total flow but found that you can get the exact same result from clicking on the report generator (include default template). A table of mass flow will then be given for each inlet, outlet and opening in the report preview window along with other useful information. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Member
|
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 7,133
Rep Power: 60 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I have not checked but am pretty sure massflow gives the total flux, so it can go positive or negative. If there are regions of both forward and backward flow it will return the net flux (forwards-backwards).
Of course you do not define a direction for massflow - it is simply the massflow across the surface. Not sure how you could split the flow into forward and backwards components. It is simple if your surface is flat, but if curved it is a bit trickier. |
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Can 'shock waves' occur in viscous fluid flows? | diaw | Main CFD Forum | 105 | November 20, 2009 04:19 |
| Zero area faces on the axis as symmetryPlane | make | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 2 | October 16, 2007 05:47 |
| Target Mass Flow Rate | Nitin | FLUENT | 6 | March 12, 2004 05:39 |
| Multiphase flow modeling | Paul | CFX | 2 | August 11, 2003 09:41 |
| Question on 3D potential flow | Adrin Gharakhani | Main CFD Forum | 13 | June 21, 1999 05:18 |