CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > CFX

How many prism layers should be added in a pump simulation?

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   June 16, 2009, 16:27
Default How many prism layers should be added in a pump simulation?
  #1
Member
 
^_^
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 36
Rep Power: 17
Jasmine is on a distinguished road
How much influence will the number of cells inside Boudary layers influence the final flow field inside a centrifugal pump. usually how many layers should be used? Is 5 enough?
Jasmine is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 16, 2009, 19:34
Default
  #2
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,665
Rep Power: 143
ghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really nice
Hi,

This is problem dependant. Some designs will require more, some will require less. Also it will depend on the level of accuracy you want in the simulation - is an error of 30% acceptable? Then don't bother about inflation layers at all. Do you need 5% error - then you will need accurate boundary layer modelling.

You will have to figure it out for your design and for the level of accuracy you want. The documentation has some good guides as to general principles but you have to adapt it to your circumstance.

Glenn Horrocks
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 17, 2009, 17:02
Default
  #3
Member
 
Paulo Alexandre Costa Rocha
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 71
Rep Power: 17
paulo is on a distinguished road
Hi,

Just to be more precise, under my experience.

You have to run your problem until convergence, and evaluate the y+ over the wing.

It must be at least less than 100, if your problem is incompressible.

If it is more than 100, you will have to put more layers in a way that the domain gets more refined.

Best Regards,

Paulo Rocha.
paulo is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 17, 2009, 17:05
Default
  #4
Member
 
Paulo Alexandre Costa Rocha
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 71
Rep Power: 17
paulo is on a distinguished road
Adendum

It is better to use hex meshes at least in the boundary layer region. Avoid tetrahedrons there.

Best Regards,

Paulo Rocha
paulo is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 3, 2020, 11:15
Default
  #5
New Member
 
Dileep S
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 8
dileeps is on a distinguished road
Hi, Is it the total layer thickness or first layer thickness more
important?
dileeps is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 3, 2020, 20:58
Default
  #6
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,665
Rep Power: 143
ghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really nice
They are both important. You need the first layer fine enough that you are using a suitable y+, and you need enough total thickness to cover the entire high gradient region in the boundary layer. Both need to be acceptable for the simulated boundary layer to be accurate.
__________________
Note: I do not answer CFD questions by PM. CFD questions should be posted on the forum.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
ICEM - problems with prism mesh João Lourenço CFX 2 September 18, 2019 04:07
Getting prism to inflate into mixed tet-hex meshes Joe CFX 16 October 10, 2011 08:06
Icemcfd: Preventing prism inflation collisions? Joe CFX 1 July 31, 2007 10:13
Rotary vane pump simulation usker Siemens 1 February 14, 2007 04:52
pump simulation chandra FLUENT 1 March 18, 2003 15:51


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 13:33.