CFD Online URL
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > CFX

multi fluid mixture model issue

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   August 5, 2009, 07:43
Default multi fluid mixture model issue
  #1
New Member
 
harry
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 29
Rep Power: 7
rystokes is on a distinguished road
HI all,

I was trying to establish a model to simulate how two different kinds of liquid mixing with each other within an enclosed domain which is under rotating.

I use two liquids "water" and "ink" here to be mixed(I just duplicate the physical property of "water" to create "ink"). And in the simulation, gravity can be ignored and it's basically a laminar flow.

There are couples of options in the "fluid models" tab of the domain setting up in Pre-CFX, "Free surface model" has two options in its dropping down list: "none" and " standard".I assume the two fluids shouldn't have a distinct interface, since there should be a kind of mixing effect into each other, so "free surface model" shouldn't be utilized, and "none" should be toggled, is it correct?

I noticed " homogeneous model" refers to that the multi fluids will share the flow fields in the simulation, and it's often used together with free surface model. So my question is that once I didn't choose free surface model, does it mean I needn't toggle the "homogeneous model" option please?

Besides, in the "fluid pair models" tab of the domain setting, there is an option called" interphase transfer", and its dropping down list contains two: "none" and "miture model". My another question is should I use this "miture model" in my case? I didn't find any help from CFX tutorial regarding this.

Thank you very much for your kind help in advance!
rystokes is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 5, 2009, 21:53
Default
  #2
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 9,874
Rep Power: 78
ghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura about
If the two fluids just mix by diffusion and advect around with each other then it might be better to model the ink as a passive scalar. Much simpler and will run much faster. Have a look under additional variables in the documentation. This approach is not valid if the fluids have different properties.

Glenn Horrocks
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 9, 2009, 09:03
Default
  #3
New Member
 
harry
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 29
Rep Power: 7
rystokes is on a distinguished road
Hi Glenn,

Thanks for your kind reply. Since the mixing is supposed to be generated at the molecular level between "ink" and "water", it's a kind of microscalar mixing, I noticed that multiphase model is at macroscalar level, so perhaps it's not suitable.

Do you mean I should use multicomponent model to simulate it? I don't know how to establish a passive scalar for ink, do you have any reference or tutorial that could help me to fix it? Or is there any documentation introducing how to establish a multicomponent mixing case? Thanks a lot.

By the way, when you said that "This approach is not valid if the fluids have different properties.", which approach do you refer to , the passive scalar in multicomponent model?

Have a great day.

Harry
rystokes is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 9, 2009, 20:13
Default
  #4
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 9,874
Rep Power: 78
ghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura about
The passive scalar approach just has a scalar variable which gets advected/diffused into the flow. This approach is very good if the stuff is truly passive, that is it has not effect on the bulk fluid properties. It is also good when the quantity of ink is small enough that its effect on the properties of the mixed fluid is insignificant.

If the ink and water have significantly different properties and there is enough ink around to change the properties then you have to be more careful. You might be able to use a additional variable with the concentration of the variable linked into material properties, not sure as I have not done this. The alternative is to go to multi component mixtures and then the bulk material properties comes from the local composition.

Your first line is correct - if the mixing is on the molecular level then a multiphase approach is not appropriate.

Have a look in the tutorials for additional variables. I think a few examples use them.

Glenn
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Combustion model - Fluid Material geothokar CFX 60 August 11, 2009 08:31
Free surface or Mixture Model ? Hervé CFX 4 October 8, 2008 04:44
Concentric tube heat exchanger (Air-Water) Young CFX 5 October 7, 2008 00:17
Two-Phase Buoyant Flow Issue Miguel Baritto CFX 4 August 31, 2006 13:02
Water vapour condensation in CFX-5.7.1 hdj CFX 1 November 27, 2005 08:15


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:19.