CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > CFX

Mesh quality

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   August 19, 2009, 05:34
Default Mesh quality
  #1
New Member
 
Andrej Hoyningen
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 22
Rep Power: 7
darookie is on a distinguished road
Which quality option in ICEM refers to the quality specifications in the ANSYS CFX Solver Manager
-> Minimum Orthogonality Angle
-> Maximum Aspect Ratio
-> Maximum Mesh Expansion factor

Furthermore can you give me a guideline for a good Mesh, because the guidance in the help function of ICEM is not sufficient. After i have reached the requirements(Angle >18, Determinant >0.3,Warpage <45) my simulation still does not converge.
Thanks
darookie is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 19, 2009, 07:58
Default
  #2
cbr
New Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 7
cbr is on a distinguished road
good convergence besides good mesh quality dependeds on correct boundary conditions, timestep.
Have you looked at CFX guidance? Mesh requirements are described there also
cbr is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 19, 2009, 08:12
Default
  #3
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 10,658
Rep Power: 84
ghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura about
The quality requirements are just a guess for "normal" simulations. Some simple simulations work fine with much worse quality meshes. More complex simulations (eg multiphase, transonic, chemistry) often need much higher mesh quality. So the mesh quality requirements for a simulation depend on the type of simulation.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 19, 2009, 10:18
Default
  #4
New Member
 
Andrej Hoyningen
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 22
Rep Power: 7
darookie is on a distinguished road
I simulate a coal combustion with particle tracking and the simulation struggles to converge the heat transfer equation and the particle source change rates. I thought the first error prone step is the mesh quality. So how can I proove if my grid quality is sufficient besides the other effects (boundary,problem, timestep)
Maybe the attached residuals can help
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2478/...2d74020f_o.png
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2593/...be9af1c2_o.png
darookie is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 19, 2009, 19:25
Default
  #5
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 10,658
Rep Power: 84
ghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura about
First look here: http://www.cfd-online.com/Wiki/Ansys...gence_criteria

If you suspect mesh quality is the issue then, as the page says, include the convergence residuals in the output file. Look at it in CFD-Post and confirm that the region of high residuals coincides with the region of poor mesh. This will tell you whether mesh quality is in fact the problem.

Glenn
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
mesh quality

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
fluent add additional zones for the mesh file SSL FLUENT 2 January 26, 2008 12:55
basic of mesh refinement arya CFX 4 June 19, 2007 12:21
Icemcfd 11: Loss of mesh from surface mesh option? Joe CFX 2 March 26, 2007 18:10
mesh quality julie FLUENT 5 July 26, 2004 05:31
Mesh quality measures on quad-dominant meshes Kerrin Burnnand Main CFD Forum 0 May 10, 2001 03:47


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:28.