 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
[Sponsors] | ||||
September 23, 2009, 18:49
|
|
#21 |
|
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,703
Rep Power: 143  |
If you kept the mesh the same then the memory and processor requirements will not have changed much. I have no idea why you would do as you say, you just cause problems. Sure you can scale it back again through Reynolds number but if there are other important scales then it looses accuracy.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| couple of questions to Code_Saturne Developers | Ahmed | Main CFD Forum | 2 | May 3, 2009 13:54 |
| A couple of questions about GAMG | piotr | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 0 | April 23, 2008 07:09 |
| Couple of Beginner Questions | hydromodeler | OpenFOAM Installation | 5 | February 27, 2008 04:34 |
| Couple of questions in Fluent | Vidya | FLUENT | 5 | July 27, 2006 02:08 |
| [Commercial meshers] Trimmed cell and embedded refinement mesh conversion issues | michele | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 2 | July 15, 2005 04:15 |
Linear Mode
