|December 2, 2009, 12:57||
Gradient Discretization CFX vs Fluent
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 13Rep Power: 8
I am a traditional Fluent user trying to compare CFX runs to Fluent runs.
A few versions ago Fluent added an option under discretization for gradients
1) Green-Gauss Node based
2) Green-Gauss Cell based
3) Least Squares Cell based
I am having trouble finding help on 1) does CFX have similar options 2) what is CFXs default
If a simple answer exists (i.e. CFX only does #2 from the list above) that would be great.
Thanks in advance
|December 2, 2009, 17:46||
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 11,589Rep Power: 90
The approach in CFX is totally different to Fluent. Fluent is cell-centred so the gradients need to be calculated at the cell boundaries and hence the options you list. CFX uses a semi-Finite Element approach with shape functions. See the theory manual in the documentation for more details.
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|CFX or FLuent?||michelle||CFX||7||June 10, 2014 07:38|
|Fluent and CFX||Ale||Main CFD Forum||7||July 30, 2008 21:14|
|Fluent Vs CFX, density and pressure||Omer||CFX||9||June 28, 2007 04:13|
|Reynolds Stress Model in Fluent Vs CFX||Tim||FLUENT||0||December 6, 2005 23:03|
|CFX vs STAR-CD and Fluent||William||CFX||20||October 29, 2001 14:55|