CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > CFX

When to use mass flow averaging

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Like Tree4Likes
  • 4 Post By ghorrocks

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   December 5, 2009, 19:59
Default When to use mass flow averaging
  #1
New Member
 
Carlos
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0
cspectre is on a distinguished road
I am studying CFX tutorial 9, flow through a pipe with a butterfly valve.

In this tutorial, the flow is assumed to be incompressible.

I'm trying to find out when its necessary to use mass flow averaging over area averaging.

My question is, which averaging method (area averaging or mass flow averaging) would provide the best results for calculating the average pressure at a location down the pipe, and why?

In addition, which would be most suitable to calculate the average velocity and why.

Its the why thats the main thing im trying to find out. Am hoping some knowlegeable people out there can help me!
cspectre is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 6, 2009, 05:45
Default
  #2
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,665
Rep Power: 143
ghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really nice
Area averaging simply averages over the area (no surprises there) as:
integral of variable dA/total area

Mass flow averaging is:
integral of rho*normal velocity*variable dA/total mass flow

If the integration surface is normal to the flow then in incompressible flow the results are identical. If the surface is not normal to the flow the results can differ because mass flow includes a normal velocity bit but area averaging does not. In compressible flow they are both different as rho is not constant.

To find a representative pressure downstream from a valve it is best to use area averaging. The reason has nothing to do with the explanation above - simply because pressure is not advected with the flow and is an area-based thing then use an area integral to average. Something like temperature is advected with the flow and if you use mass flow average you are effectively working out the total enthalpy across the surface which is a physically relevant quantity.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 6, 2009, 06:30
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Carlos
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0
cspectre is on a distinguished road
thanks for your help on this. much appreciated
cspectre is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
mass flow Wenbin Song FLUENT 0 September 27, 2005 14:00
mass flow rate error Masood FLUENT 0 May 22, 2005 01:32
Mass flow rate Neser CFX 4 February 14, 2004 01:27
Determine mass flow rate along flow path Atit Koonsrisuk CFX 2 October 5, 2003 05:47
Mass Flow Inlet Pravir Kumar Rai FLUENT 0 February 19, 2003 15:03


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:43.