CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > CFX

variable transport from one domain to other

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   December 16, 2009, 05:07
Default variable transport from one domain to other
  #1
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 34
Rep Power: 8
cosine is on a distinguished road
Hello,
I have a problem with two domains (imagine one tube in a bigger one). I add a variable to calculate mass transfer to the first domain (inner tube). i want this variable to penetrate to other domain and to be calculated there.
What boundary condition is appropriate? This penetration is shear stress depended.
Thanks a lot
cosine is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 16, 2009, 17:41
Default
  #2
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 10,646
Rep Power: 84
ghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura about
I have no idea what you are trying to do. Is the inner tube porous? Where do you want to calculate the mass transfer?
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 16, 2009, 18:27
Default
  #3
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 34
Rep Power: 8
cosine is on a distinguished road
Thanks for your answer!
Let me explain better my problem. I have two flows, one in the inner tube which is fluid and one in the outer which is porous domain. Interaction exists only at the common interface where penetration of a molecule exists.
Inner tube:
I define inlet boundary condition at one edge and outlet at the other. Also i add a variable to calculate the diffusion of a molecule concentration. Here is the problem. I want the common "interface" of the tube to be permeable and the molecule to be diffused to the porous domain. Also this diffusion is shear stress depended. So the mass transfer need to be calculated in both domains.
I have tried to solve it using two configurations but i think that the molecule is not diffused to the porous domain.
Also i have tried using an interface but then i think that i cannot use a shear stress depended diffusion.
I hope that you could understand now, otherwise i could post some photos
Thanks a lot again
cosine is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 17, 2009, 06:02
Default
  #4
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 10,646
Rep Power: 84
ghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura about
I have no experience in this sort of modelling, but can't you define your concentration as a mass fraction with a different diffusivity defined in the fluid and porous regions? And hopefully you can put some sort of resistance at the interface and with some luck make it a function of local wall shear stress.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 28, 2009, 16:23
Default
  #5
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 34
Rep Power: 8
cosine is on a distinguished road
Thanks for your answer.
I will try shortly.
cosine is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 29, 2009, 19:13
Default
  #6
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 210
Rep Power: 8
kingjewel1 is on a distinguished road
Diffusion can be modelled algebraically via the use of the CEL for the kinematic transport. I don't quite know how what you're looking for but how about using: kinematic diffusivity = ave(Shear Strain)@small pipe, or some such?
kingjewel1 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 29, 2009, 19:39
Default
  #7
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 34
Rep Power: 8
cosine is on a distinguished road
Thanks,
I want to calculate the concentration in the porous domain, while this arrives from the fluid domain. Could i connect the results of a calculations between two different analysis systems?
I thought, i could use "flux in" at the porous domain using an expression which is depend on the wall shear stress as calculated in the fluid domain.
I hope you could understand now.
cosine is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 30, 2009, 06:58
Default
  #8
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 210
Rep Power: 8
kingjewel1 is on a distinguished road
So in fact it is the porosity of the domain (sort of osmosis) based on the stress you are interested in not specifically the kinematic molecular diffusion. I still think this is possible using CEL through porous loss though I haven't tried it.
kingjewel1 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 30, 2009, 07:04
Default
  #9
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 34
Rep Power: 8
cosine is on a distinguished road
Yes, exactly. The interface is a biological membrane with specified properties which someone could model using Kedem-Katchalsky equations. The problem is that i cannot use the wall shear stress of one domain to the second one. When i did it, actually i use the wall shear stress of the porous domain.
I use the CEL to describe all necessary equations, but i don't know how to define one calculated variable from the fluid domain in the porous domain.
cosine is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
additional variable, boundary condition, cfx

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
error in COMSOL:'ERROR:6164 Duplicate Variable' bhushas Main CFD Forum 1 May 30, 2008 04:35
Additional Variable - Diffusive Transport Equation RadheShyam Das CFX 3 October 18, 2007 12:35
Env variable not set gruber2 OpenFOAM Installation 5 December 30, 2005 05:27
Replace periodic by inlet-outlet pair lego CFX 3 November 5, 2002 21:09


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 21:51.