CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > CFX

loss coefficient

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   December 16, 2009, 14:40
Default loss coefficient
  #1
New Member
 
Mike
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 14
Rep Power: 7
wilson is on a distinguished road
I performed a laminar flow computation on a turbulent flow and found a loss coefficient of 3.54. Using the k-e model, the loss coefficient was 3.80. Why are these different? I think it is something to do with the dissipation of energy but I am looking for a better explanation.

Thanks
wilson is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 16, 2009, 17:46
Default
  #2
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 10,826
Rep Power: 85
ghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura about
There are many reasons why if you magically make a flow laminar it could have lower loss coefficients. The main reason is probably due to the much reduced shear stress in the boundary layer leading to reduced drag, but there could be other reasons. For more information see a turbulence textbook.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Outlet Vent Loss Coefficient jpo FLUENT 0 June 24, 2009 19:15
Automotive test case vinz OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 98 October 27, 2008 09:43
bc's to find pres loss coefficient??? DON CD-adapco 7 June 28, 2007 14:09
Loss coefficient at openings Forrest CFX 1 June 11, 2005 18:09
Need help for loss coefficient of elbow diffuser Pete Main CFD Forum 0 November 9, 2004 03:54


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:26.