|
[Sponsors] |
January 5, 2010, 07:22 |
Inverse degassing condition?
|
#1 |
New Member
Boris
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 16 |
Hi all,
I'm trying to model a gas/liquid cyclone with liquid loadings up to 20%. Hence the gas will be the continuous phase in all cases. In the bottom part I have a fixed amount of liquid, so I can use rho*g*h as a pressure boundary condition at the bottom outlet. At the top outlet I'm looking for some kind of inverse degassing condition. I want this outlet to behave like an outlet for the continuous phase (gas), but the for dispersed phase (liquid) it has to behave as a (free slip) wall. The standard degassing condition is only able to do the opposite (outlet for dispersed phase and wall for continuous phase). Could anyone tell me if this is possible? Any other recommendations on the boundary conditions are welcome as well. regards, Boris |
|
January 5, 2010, 12:25 |
|
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 49
Rep Power: 17 |
One option may be using a porous media model--put high resistance on liquid phase and no resistance on gas phase.
Last edited by John; January 6, 2010 at 08:36. |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Degassing boundary condition in Fluent? | srjp | FLUENT | 5 | May 12, 2023 04:32 |
About degassing boundary condition | superqtp | FLUENT | 0 | September 8, 2009 05:24 |
Degassing boundary condition | Ayman Dohdoh | FLUENT | 0 | October 28, 2007 04:41 |
Degassing Condition.......Please Help | Paresh Jain | CFX | 1 | February 19, 2004 12:19 |
Degassing Boundary Condition ???? | thomas | CFX | 2 | February 12, 2004 02:59 |