CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > CFX

Modeling chemically reacting flow

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   January 18, 2010, 04:02
Default Modeling chemically reacting flow
  #1
New Member
 
Zamier
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0
Zamo is on a distinguished road
I am modeling chemically reacting gas flowing through a tube. The reaction is a 5 stage multistage mechanism which i have already incorporated into cfx. Each step has a rate expression. The problem arises when i select the finite rate chemistry option. I then get a overflow error, or a newton iteration error when using a laminar model. I have used a tubulence model (k-e and k-omega hybrid) with no such error, but the solution just returns my initial conditions. Any suggestions?
Zamo is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 18, 2010, 06:08
Default
  #2
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 10,796
Rep Power: 84
ghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura about
Sounds like the flow is turbulent so a laminar model will never converge (well, not in steady state anyway). Why did you remove the turbulence model? I guess because the model did not move from the initial conditions.

I think you should concentrate on getting the turbulent model to move from the initial conditions.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 18, 2010, 07:06
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Zamier
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0
Zamo is on a distinguished road
Im trying to simulate the idealized case before i get ahead of myself but I guess there is no testing the waters. Might as well just jump in. Any suggestions on how to make the solver move from the initial conditions. It is a steady state simulation. After 30 iterations i check the solution and is looks reasonable but the residuals are too high. I then run it from that point on interpolating the results as an initial guess, then it converges to my original initial guess.....what now?
Zamo is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 18, 2010, 17:43
Default
  #4
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 10,796
Rep Power: 84
ghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura about
It is a common mistake to think that a laminar simulation will be a good start to a more complex turbulent simulation. It does not work that way, you will never get the laminar simulation to converge. The turbulence model is required to damp the turbulence fluctuations to achieve convergence so you cannot run without it.

You have not described what you are doing in much detail so we cannot help your specific issue.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Modeling sudden flow in Vacuum chamber Sandilya Garimella FLUENT 0 February 8, 2008 16:04
Modeling reduced flow rate in 2D Tom Smith FLUENT 2 April 27, 2007 09:04
Modeling Bleed in Supersonic Flow Mohd Yousuf Ali FLUENT 0 March 17, 2007 04:51
experts in multiphase flow modeling in fluent.inc? Asghari FLUENT 0 March 13, 2007 03:46
Inviscid Drag at subsonic, subcritical Mach # Axel Rohde Main CFD Forum 1 November 19, 2001 13:19


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:23.