CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > CFX

Under-relaxation factors

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   February 19, 2010, 11:53
Default Under-relaxation factors
  #1
New Member
 
Steven Tay
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 28
Rep Power: 7
steventay is on a distinguished road
Hello,

May I know how to set under-relaxation factors for the velocity components, pressure correction and thermal energy for CFX? Many thanks!
steventay is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 19, 2010, 12:22
Default
  #2
Member
 
prout
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 32
Rep Power: 8
zboud is on a distinguished road
Same as the other post, but "Basic settings" tab ... there you have the Timescale factor.
zboud is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 19, 2010, 12:48
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Steven Tay
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 28
Rep Power: 7
steventay is on a distinguished road
Hi Zboud,

Thanks again!
steventay is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 20, 2010, 06:14
Default
  #4
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 10,830
Rep Power: 85
ghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura about
One further comment - under relaxation factors are commonly adjusted in SIMPLE based solvers like Fluent. It is very common to have to adjust them to obtain convergence. CFX is not a simple based solver and while it does have under relaxation factors it is very rare to have to adjust them. As zboud says, in CFX a far preferable way of adjusting solver stability in most cases is by using the time step size.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 20, 2010, 08:14
Default
  #5
New Member
 
Steven Tay
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 28
Rep Power: 7
steventay is on a distinguished road
Hi Glen,

Thanks for your comments. This info definitely helps. I have been trying to adjust the time-steps to achieve convergence, however, having reducing to 0.1s and 200 iterations, the run still does not convergence. Do I need to keep reducing the time-step till I get convergence? Is there any other setting that I need to do to help in the convergence? Thanks.
steventay is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 20, 2010, 13:54
Default
  #6
Senior Member
 
feizaghaee's Avatar
 
moein
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 132
Rep Power: 7
feizaghaee is on a distinguished road
Send a message via Yahoo to feizaghaee
what are you modeling?
feizaghaee is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 21, 2010, 03:39
Default
  #7
New Member
 
Steven Tay
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 28
Rep Power: 7
steventay is on a distinguished road
Hi,

I am modeling a tank filled with fluid 1 and 1 coil of tubes coiled in the tank with fluid 2 flowing in the tube. The temp of fluids 1 and 2 will be in two extremes. I will measure the outlet temp of the tube and some points in the tank to know the temp change in fluid 1 as fluid 2 is passing thru the tube.

Meshing of this model is very difficult as even I have set the span angle and relevance center to fine, I still get the skewness ratio of 0.99958.

I set the convergence criteria to 1e-6 at the basic setting but with the timestep set at 0.1s and 200 iterations, it still does not converge. Should I continue to reduce the timestep or increase the number of iterations?

I am trying to set individual convergence criteria as I no need all the criteria to be set at 1e-6. For my run, my understanding is that themal energy is more vital and the rest of the setting can be set at 1e-3.

Any advise and suggestion are welcome and I need to know whether I am moving in the right direction and what else I can do to get convergence. Thank you and appreciate all of your time for reading my post!
steventay is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 21, 2010, 04:28
Default
  #8
Senior Member
 
feizaghaee's Avatar
 
moein
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 132
Rep Power: 7
feizaghaee is on a distinguished road
Send a message via Yahoo to feizaghaee
continueing may not result in convergence. you should consider the rate of residual reduction. if it's very bouncy it may not converge. if it's reducing with acceptable rate continue it. but if the residuals are unstable try another time scale.
feizaghaee is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 21, 2010, 07:34
Default
  #9
New Member
 
Steven Tay
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 28
Rep Power: 7
steventay is on a distinguished road
Thanks for your prompt reply. I will consider your suggestions.
steventay is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 21, 2010, 19:01
Default
  #10
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 10,830
Rep Power: 85
ghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura about
Sounds like a pretty common problem:

http://www.cfd-online.com/Wiki/Ansys...gence_criteria
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Relaxation Factors for Transient solvers philippose OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 19 March 20, 2014 05:39
relaxation factors and time accuracy Mike Main CFD Forum 7 May 21, 2005 12:41
Relaxation Factors Tim Phoenics 3 June 30, 2004 02:03
relaxation factors zhujianguo Phoenics 1 August 5, 2003 06:17
relaxation factors adjust zhujianguo Phoenics 1 July 15, 2003 11:11


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:15.