CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > CFX

what's the definition of (Velocity u.Gradient X) PLS?

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   February 25, 2010, 00:23
Default what's the definition of (Velocity u.Gradient X) PLS?
  #1
New Member
 
harry
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 29
Rep Power: 8
rystokes is on a distinguished road
Hi,

I'm wondering of the exact definition of some variable calculators provided by CFX POST, such as (Velocity u.Gradient X), (Velocity v.Gradient Y), (Velocity w.Gradient Z) please?

Do they simply mean the velocity component gradient on each direction please? In that case, the value should have a unit of "s", however, I noticed there is not such unit. Besides, I sum the above three terms in order to verify the conservation of mass (density is constant), while the result is far from zero (in solve process, the calculation reached convergency). Similar thing also happens when I tried to check momentum equation balance.

Could anyone give me advice or help please?

Thanks!
rystokes is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 25, 2010, 03:04
Default
  #2
New Member
 
harry
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 29
Rep Power: 8
rystokes is on a distinguished road
anyone help me please?
rystokes is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 25, 2010, 14:21
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 14
Rep Power: 8
longbow is on a distinguished road
The unit of those variables should be [s^-1] instead of [s]. Where did you sum those three terms, over a surface or volume?
longbow is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 25, 2010, 23:21
Default
  #4
New Member
 
harry
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 29
Rep Power: 8
rystokes is on a distinguished road
Hi,

Yes, you are right. I just simply created several points in the fluid domain, and for each point, I can obtain the three terms by calculators in post, and summed them, because I think the continuity equation should work for each point. Do you mean I should sum over a surface or volume please?
rystokes is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 26, 2010, 05:40
Default
  #5
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 10,926
Rep Power: 85
ghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura about
When you set a point in CFD-post it just interpolates the value from the surrounding nodes. This interpolation is not conservative - meaning that conservation is not enforced. Conservation is enforced at the control volume level, or at least you converge towards conservation.

You have not explained what you want to do. Do you want to check conservation at a point (ie in an individual control volume)? Or do you want to check global conservation (ie inlet flow equals the outlet flow)? Both of these are reported in the output file - the first as the residual, and the second as imbalances.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 26, 2010, 07:04
Default
  #6
New Member
 
harry
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 29
Rep Power: 8
rystokes is on a distinguished road
Hi Glenn,

Thanks a lot for your input. Yes, I just want to check the conservation at a point.
rystokes is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 26, 2010, 07:19
Default
  #7
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 10,926
Rep Power: 85
ghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura about
OK, well first of all you can't do conservation at a point. The smallest unit is the control volume and conservation is achieved by the fluxes through the control volume faces. You do not have access to the fluxes in the control volume faces in CFD-Post, you will have to use fortran to access them.

But why do you want to do this? If you want to see how good the convergence is then just look at the residuals. Have a look in the documentation for what the residual means.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 26, 2010, 09:10
Default
  #8
New Member
 
harry
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 29
Rep Power: 8
rystokes is on a distinguished road
Hi Glenn,

I got it. Thank you very much for your kind help.
rystokes is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
UDF velocity and temperature Raj FLUENT 3 February 1, 2009 19:29
How to judge the velocity boundary layer thick... xumustc Main CFD Forum 4 September 29, 2008 02:15
calculate the average velocity of particles robert FLUENT 0 August 1, 2008 09:44
How to calculate Velocity? Kali Sanjay Phoenics 1 May 1, 2006 13:57
particle velocity and velocity profile HGG FLUENT 2 June 10, 2001 16:32


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:06.