CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > CFX

CFD assistance

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   February 26, 2010, 08:37
Default CFD assistance
  #1
Member
 
Venkat
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 35
Rep Power: 7
enr_venkat is on a distinguished road
Hi Everyone,

I'm quite new to ANSYS -CFX and i don't have wide experience in CFD analysis. However, i'm exposed to fluid mechanics, heat transfer and numerical methods and i've read CFD fundamentals. I still find difficult to understand certain concepts. I'm a fresh postgraduate and i used CFD for my thesis. I'm practising CFD now. I'm currently working on an automotive exhaust component such as EGR valve to determine the temperature proven capability. I'm not sure about the boundary conditions that i use. To be precise, the valve pushes down inside the EGR assembly so that flue gases enter through the gaps and leaves out. Valve timing would be 150 ms operation. I calculated the mass flow rate of gas mixture (standard data taken) and i know the inlet pressure. Generally the total pressure is the sum of static pressure / gauge pressure and operating pressure. I also know the differential pressure across the valve (5Kpa) and inlet temperature (750 C). My aim is to calculate the temperature distribution on the solid plunger that moves up and down i.e I'm looking at temperature distribution on plunger due to fluid flow. I don't get proper convergence trends. My initial conditions are static pressure and temperature. Even i'm not sure about these values. I had guessed and put these values. How do we judge initial conditions and how do we interpret results in CFD. When i ran the simulation, the temperature distribution on valve seems to be almost equal i.e. i see slight variation. I need to convince my boss that CFD analysis helps to accelerate product development. Please help me.
enr_venkat is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 3, 2010, 11:22
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Rikio
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: SH, China
Posts: 182
Blog Entries: 1
Rep Power: 8
rikio is on a distinguished road
Send a message via Skype™ to rikio
What type of problem are you running?
Maybe a transient analysis is needed for different temperature distribution on the plunger. Because the T will go to a almost the same value for the whole part in a steady state analysis, just as you have got now. Am I right?
rikio is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 4, 2010, 02:13
Default
  #3
Member
 
Venkat
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 35
Rep Power: 7
enr_venkat is on a distinguished road
That sounds right ! But steady state simulation is performed with the available data. Do you suggest me to run a transient simulation and check the results. I didn't use thermal boundary conditions for the product. I kept the Heat fux option to be adiabatic which is not right in real cases. Atleast i could show my boss about the flow patterns. How do we calculate physical timescale for fluid and solid domain ? I also get messages during iteration that "some portion of fluid flow is trying to enter the outlet domain, If you persist this condition, switch over to opening type boundary conition" Why should i do that ? I hope opening boundary conditions depend on the type of problem handled. I was trying to do a conjugate heat transfer and visualise the hot spots in the fluid and solid domain. Please pitch on physical timescale and boundary conditions
enr_venkat is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
STAR-Works : Mainstream CAD with CFD CD adapco Group Marketing CD-adapco 0 February 13, 2002 13:23
Where do we go from here? CFD in 2001 John C. Chien Main CFD Forum 36 January 24, 2001 22:10
ASME CFD Symposium, Atlanta, July 2001 Chris R. Kleijn Main CFD Forum 0 August 21, 2000 04:49
Since Last June John C. Chien Main CFD Forum 3 July 12, 1999 09:38
Which is better to develop in-house CFD code or to buy a available CFD package. Tareq Al-shaalan Main CFD Forum 10 June 12, 1999 23:27


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 13:47.