# boundary conditions and turbulence intensity

 User Name Remember Me Password
 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 April 5, 2010, 10:27 boundary conditions and turbulence intensity #1 Senior Member   Join Date: Jan 2010 Posts: 110 Rep Power: 7 Dear all. I am modeling a rectangular channel with water. At the present moment I am dealing with 2 difficulties. 1) I have created the following expressions for the initial settings: DenWater= 997; DownH = 0.14[m](height of water at downstream); DownPres= DenWater*g*DownVFWater*(DownH-y) (hydrostatic distribution at outlet) DownVFWater= if(y

April 5, 2010, 19:04
#2
Super Moderator

Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 10,824
Rep Power: 85
Try using a velocity boundary at the inlet rather than a pressure inlet. Do you know the flow rate? If so then this approach makes sense.

Quote:
 It is possible to set different turbulence intensities in the 3 directions using the k-epsilon model?
No. k-e is an isotropic turbulence model and therefore the turbulence is assumed equal in all directions. If you have anisotropic turbulence then you have to use a Reynolds Stress model or LES/DES.

 April 6, 2010, 05:24 #3 Senior Member   Join Date: Jan 2010 Posts: 110 Rep Power: 7 Hi Horrocks. I have done precisely that (by the way my channel has a width of 0.14 m a length of 1.7 m and a height of 0.14 m and an inclination of 9*10^-4). What you see above are the expressions that I have used in the "expressions field" in the CFX-Pre. However when I defined the boundary conditions for the inlet boundary I have used also the option cartesian velocity components. As the documentation say (and you also say that) defining a velocity at the inlet and the pressure at the outlet is usually the most robust way of defining the boundary conditions. Is the expression that I have used for the distribution of the pressure at inlet unnecessary (I think/thought that the solver need this information). In what concerns the question related to turbulence intensities thanks for the answer..that what I was thinking but it always good to check. Best regards

 April 6, 2010, 11:57 #4 Senior Member   Bruno Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Brazil Posts: 236 Rep Power: 12 Hi Antonio, What you should do is set velocity at the inlet (as you are doing with the cartesian components) and then set free surface level using the volume fractions (the UpVFWater expression you have there). At the outlet prescribe the static pressure (not the average static pressure) and use the expression you have for hidrostatic pressure. That should do the job. But you should check the tutorial CFX has on free surface over a bump. Cheers.

 April 6, 2010, 12:03 #5 Senior Member   Join Date: Jan 2010 Posts: 110 Rep Power: 7 Dear All. Analyzing the results that I have I can see that I have an adverse pressure gradient in the bottom of my channel.I think that this is what is causing the recirculation of the flow. How can I control this?Any suggestion? I am thinking changing the boundaries conditions (at the present moment I have a velocity at inlet and Static Pressure at Outlet):specifying the total pressure at Inlet and the velocity of the flow at Outlet. Best Regards

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post Saturn CFX 34 October 16, 2014 05:27 Pankaj CFX 9 November 23, 2009 05:05 Mark CFX 6 November 15, 2004 16:55 Tudor Miron CFX 15 April 2, 2004 06:18 Tudor Miron CFX 17 March 19, 2004 20:23

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:39.

 Contact Us - CFD Online - Top