CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > CFX

negative mass flow at the outlet of vessel at the last timestep!

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   May 18, 2010, 03:20
Default negative mass flow at the outlet of vessel at the last timestep!
  #1
smn
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 56
Rep Power: 8
smn is on a distinguished road
hi:
i have modeled a blood vessel with pulsatile velocity inlet and constant pressure outlet.all of the results are thue and there is no problem,only:
at the last timestep (end time) the number of mass flow at the outlet becomes negative...
can anyone help me?
best regards
smn is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 18, 2010, 07:58
Default
  #2
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 10,823
Rep Power: 85
ghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura about
What is wrong with a negative flow rate? Sounds perfectly possible to me based on how you have described the setup. If this does not physically happen then I think you will find your boundary condition setup is incorrect.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 18, 2010, 08:27
Default
  #3
smn
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 56
Rep Power: 8
smn is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by ghorrocks View Post
What is wrong with a negative flow rate? Sounds perfectly possible to me based on how you have described the setup. If this does not physically happen then I think you will find your boundary condition setup is incorrect.
Thanks for your help:
mass flow is positive in all timesteps except the last one.vector plot shows that the flow leaves the "outlet boundary" in all of the timesteps also the last one.how can it be possible?
i have tried both "outlet" and "opening" boundary conditions.
i should add that for example there is 164 timesteps and the mass flow at the last timestep is nearly the same as the mass flow of the 163th and this is true in my problem,but the negative sign in fuction calculator in the post cfx!!!!
regards
smn is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 18, 2010, 19:10
Default
  #4
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 10,823
Rep Power: 85
ghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura about
Quote:
how can it be possible?
Because the flow reverses at time step 164. Why do you say it is not possible? What do you know to say it cannot happen? Make sure you do not confuse the positive average flow with a momentary flow reversal. Even if the flow reverses for a short time the average flow is still positive.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 22, 2010, 09:50
Default
  #5
smn
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 56
Rep Power: 8
smn is on a distinguished road
hi ghorrocks and thanks for your replies:
i have mentioned that the
1-flow arrows (vector plot)dont show reverse flow.
2-also the blood flow in the artery can not reverse.
3-i have modeled two period of blood flow;times 0 to 0.82s and second one 0.82 to 1.64 s.how is it possible to have reverse flow in the last timestep?i have also tested very small timesteps.
regards
smn is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 23, 2010, 11:57
Default
  #6
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 34
Rep Power: 8
Claudia is on a distinguished road
If you look to a backup, e.g. iteration 150, with CFX post, the mass flow at outlet is positive?

Greets
Claudia
Claudia is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 23, 2010, 18:54
Default
  #7
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 10,823
Rep Power: 85
ghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura about
smn - you have not answered my question. Why can't the flow reverse for an instant? How do you know it does not? Do you have a flow versus time measurement with enough resolution to prove there is no reverse flow?

Just because the time average flow is always forwards does not mean for a small fraction of time reverse flow exists. Often the most interesting results are ones which you did not expect. If you dismiss them as impossible without thinking about it then you have just missed an important result.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 28, 2014, 13:47
Default mass flow sign convention
  #8
New Member
 
Reza Azizi
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0
azizireza is on a distinguished road
I answered this question, because recently I have encountered this problem.
After finding negative mass flow on output, I have checked the CFX Reference Guide page 158 (version 12.1) and find mass flow sign convention ssubject which helped me.
azizireza is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Mass flow BCs and Pressure differential BC CFDLife CFX 5 January 26, 2009 08:14
How to calculate particle mass flow rate at outlet Randy FLUENT 1 December 18, 2006 15:52
negative global mass flow rate Gimli FLUENT 0 April 21, 2006 07:17
UDF in Fluent to Match Mass Flow at Pressure Outlet Jonas Larsson Main CFD Forum 1 April 29, 1999 10:44
Constant mass flow rate / choking outlet bounardy condition Min Zhu Main CFD Forum 1 September 29, 1998 15:33


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 14:15.