CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > CFX

Strange results for rough surface

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   June 9, 2010, 10:12
Default Strange results for rough surface
  #1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 138
Rep Power: 8
camoesas is on a distinguished road
Hello Everybody,

Ive done a simulation concerning boundary layers first with a smooth wall and then with a rough wall.
Booth simulations with the k-epsilon model and the roughness height is smaller than the first cell.

I have attached a plot of the velocity vs height. As you can see the velocity for the rough wall is to large.
I would have expected the lines not to cross and the velocity for the rough wall smaller than the velocity for the smooth wall.

Is this a Problem of my Simulation, the keps Model or the rough wall?

Any help is appreciated!

Thanks

Camoesas
Attached Images
File Type: png Vergleich_rau_glatt_keps_Draht.png (4.5 KB, 20 views)
camoesas is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 9, 2010, 18:39
Default
  #2
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 10,662
Rep Power: 84
ghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura about
What y+ are you using? When you use wall functions you should not go below a y+ of about 15.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 11, 2010, 05:50
Default
  #3
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 138
Rep Power: 8
camoesas is on a distinguished road
HI Mr. Horrocks,

I have an y+ of about 1.1-1.8 (on the wall, plotted in Post)

What I dont understand is: y+ is defined as: something * wall Distance
Thus y+ should be 0 at the wall, because the Distance is zero.

But in CFX Post y+ is everywhere 0 beside from my wall...

Are there different y+ or where is my fault?

Thanks
camoesas is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 14, 2010, 18:30
Default
  #4
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 10,662
Rep Power: 84
ghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura about
y+ is calculated in the first control volume, but just shown on the wall. The distance from the wall is therefore the distance of the centroid of the first cell from the wall.

Your y+ is too low for a wall function approach. You need wall functions to use the rough wall model. You need to coarsen the model to y+>15 (about).
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Can Flow-3D plot the free surface area in Iso-surface or colour variable? therockyy FLOW-3D 1 June 20, 2010 19:36
Slip boundary condition giving strange results hemph OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 3 January 18, 2007 06:15
Normal - Helical Surface m. malik Main CFD Forum 3 February 3, 2006 13:56
Flame Surface Density. Burn Ing Main CFD Forum 3 December 5, 2004 18:12
solid edge problem....can you help? cindy Main CFD Forum 3 April 5, 2004 13:43


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 18:18.