# Lift and Drag Monitor Point Values Converging to Zero

 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 November 23, 2010, 20:01 #21 Senior Member   Joshua Counsil Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada Posts: 366 Rep Power: 10 It's been months since I posted this, but I still suffer from the same problems. My friction and pressure graphs match the published data very well, yet the function calculator in CFX incorrectly predicts the lift and drag. Notably, it often predicts a negative drag value, whether using the "force" or "forceNorm" functions. I reported this possible bug to ANSYS in August and never received a response. It's irritating because I have to manually perform my lift and drag calculations, plus my lift and drag history plots aren't accurate in magnitude. Does anyone else suffer from this problem? Has it been fixed in v13?

 May 5, 2011, 21:36 #22 Member   iswadi Join Date: Feb 2010 Posts: 44 Rep Power: 8 dear josh, i have gone through your post and i believe i have the same problem where my lift and drag value are too low and not reasonable. i also suspect there is some problem with the `force` function in the CFX calculator. is there any adjustment that u make in the CFX calculation? how do you apply the proper calculation in your works?

 May 6, 2011, 15:07 #23 Senior Member   Joshua Counsil Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada Posts: 366 Rep Power: 10 I was changing my inlet velocity angle to simulate angles of attack. That caused problems. I used the following thread to solve my problem: Airfoil negative drag coefficent

 May 9, 2011, 00:18 #24 Member   iswadi Join Date: Feb 2010 Posts: 44 Rep Power: 8 thank you mr josh, do you mean that u used this formula to simulate the AOA variation? L=Fy cos(alpha) - Fx sin(alpha) D=Fx cos(alpha) + Fy sin(alpha) actually i have already adopted this formula to simulate the AOA variation. however, my lift and drag ceofficient is still very low even at high AOA (20 degrees). i`m thinking about changing the wing mesh rotation in order to simulate the AOA variation. is it the best technique? or are there any other better ways to do it?

 May 9, 2011, 10:38 #25 Senior Member   Joshua Counsil Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada Posts: 366 Rep Power: 10 That's the formula I use. As for your problem, there are many, many possible causes. Grid resolution, turbulence model, domain size, timestepping scheme... You'll have to try some sensitivity analyses to figure out the problem. Good luck.

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post Franny CFX 15 June 2, 2014 02:36 antonio_ing OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 16 September 13, 2012 12:21 zx Main CFD Forum 4 July 27, 2007 23:38 Noé CD-adapco 5 July 13, 2004 10:21 Marat Hoshim Main CFD Forum 2 February 9, 2001 02:48

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 14:11.