|September 6, 2010, 03:28||
Time step too small?
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 28Rep Power: 6
I'm running a transient simulation of a little truck model we have in the wind tunnel. Width Re is around 640,000 for this and I'm using DES.
They have been getting a Cd value of around 0.29. I was always getting around 0.33 but ever since I reduced the size of the time steps I have gotten it to around 0.30, which is great.
However, I noticed that when I reduce the size of the time step to around 0.002 s, the vortex shedding I had observed with time step 0.005 s disappears. So my drag coefficient has improved, but I feel there should be some shedding at the rear, as that's what is happening in the wind tunnel.
Is my time step somehow too small to resolve the shedding somehow? I always thought going as small as possible was the goal.
* It should be noted I made a small geometric change before lowering the time step...it is possible that small change has somehow eradicated the shedding, but I highly doubt it.
|September 6, 2010, 08:39||
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 9,856Rep Power: 78
The smaller timestep will usually mean increased temporal resolution and therefore more shedding, not less. If it results in less shedding then you may be approaching numerical round-off and that is limiting convergence. Have you tried running double precision?
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|How to write k and epsilon before the abnormal end||xiuying||OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD||8||August 27, 2013 16:33|
|Superlinear speedup in OpenFOAM 13||msrinath80||OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD||17||August 22, 2009 04:59|
|Differences between serial and parallel runs||carsten||OpenFOAM Bugs||11||September 12, 2008 12:16|
|AMG versus ICCG||msrinath80||OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD||2||November 7, 2006 16:15|
|VOF||özgür||FLUENT||8||January 6, 2004 09:23|