CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > CFX

Missing Information in SST Transition Model Formulation

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   September 13, 2010, 18:42
Default Missing Information in SST Transition Model Formulation
  #1
Senior Member
 
Joshua Counsil
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
Posts: 366
Rep Power: 9
Josh is on a distinguished road
Good day, all -

I'm working on a paper and simulations requiring the gamma-theta transitional SST model. In the derivation of the model in the manual just after Equation (155), it reads:

The model contains three empirical correlations. Re_theta_t is the transition onset as observed in experiments. This has been modified from Menter et al. [101] in order to improve the predictions for natural transition. It is used in Equation 151. F_length is the length of the transition zone and goes into Equation 143. Re_theta_c is the point where the model is activated in order to match both Re_theta_t and F_length; it goes into Equation 146. At present, these empirical correlations are proprietary and are not given in this manual.


My problem is with the last line: "not given in this manual". Unfortunately, they are not given in the referenced paper, either (Menter et al., 2005). They are given in the original derivation (Menter et al., 2004), but, as noted above, they've been modified "in order to improve the predictions for natural transition". I found a relatively new paper ("Correlation-Based Transition Modeling for Unstructured Parallelized Computational Fluid Dynamics Codes", Langtry and Menter, 2009) that gives the empirical correlations, but I'm unsure if these are the ones that are used in CFX.


Are the correlations in the aforementioned paper (Langtry and Menter, 2009) the ones used in CFX? If not, does anyone know where they can be accessed?


Thanks!
Josh is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 14, 2010, 03:28
Default
  #2
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 10,824
Rep Power: 85
ghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura about
I am not aware of the 2009 paper you refer to so I cannot comment about what it contains. But my understanding is details like this are not published to protect CFX's IP. CFX is a commercial product and they want to make money out of it, so they give enough details so you get the general idea but not enough information so you can write you own software using their algorithm.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 14, 2010, 11:49
Default
  #3
Senior Member
 
Joshua Counsil
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
Posts: 366
Rep Power: 9
Josh is on a distinguished road
Thanks, Glenn. I figured that was the answer, but I really didn't want to hear it.
Josh is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Implementation details of SST k-omega model Niels Main CFD Forum 3 July 3, 2008 17:45
where to set CFX Transition Model? steven CFX 6 January 17, 2007 12:19
SST transitional turbulence model Ben Akih CFX 3 June 8, 2006 15:52
SST model help please! Sheila CD-adapco 2 September 6, 2004 22:39
k-omega model and unsteady transition Jens Thurso Main CFD Forum 1 May 4, 1999 09:50


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 16:37.