CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > CFX

Rotary drum attached with baffles

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   October 18, 2010, 01:27
Default Rotary drum attached with baffles
  #1
New Member
 
Pisit Chaiwiboonpol
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 6
nutow is on a distinguished road
Dear all

I am a newbie of cfx's users that would like to simulate the behavior of fluid inside the rotary drum attached with baffles. First of all, I create the geometry like a rotary drum attached with baffles and then define the baffle as the internal wall. After that, I write the input for cfx pre program.

In the cfx pre program, I specify the wall and baffle of rotary drum as the rotating wall but I found the problem which is the terminate run in the cfx solver. So I need to change boundary condition from the above condition to specify the wall of rotary drum as the rotating wall and baffles as stationary wall. Then I run the simulation and get result.

In the result of cfx post program, the result is the wall rotated but baffles is stationary.

So, I don't know how to define boundary condition for the baffles and wall are rotating along the z-axis

Pls help me.

Thanks you for your suggestion

Best Regard



nutow is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 18, 2010, 06:16
Default
  #2
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 10,929
Rep Power: 85
ghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura about
Your description is not clear but I suspect you have meshed the baffles. Unless you want to model heat flow in the baffles you won't want to do this. Remove the baffles and just leave the walls on the fluid domain left by the baffles. Then this should run fine.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 18, 2010, 07:07
Default
  #3
Senior Member
 
Michael P. Owen
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 195
Rep Power: 8
michael_owen is on a distinguished road
Actually I think the problem is that he needs to put the entire domain in a rotating frame of reference and make all the walls stationary.
michael_owen is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 18, 2010, 10:42
Default
  #4
New Member
 
Pisit Chaiwiboonpol
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 6
nutow is on a distinguished road
My objective is to study the mixing of fluid in the rotary drum attached with baffles.

Now, I try to run the simulation by define:

Domain Motion : stationary
Mesh Deformation --> Options : regions of motion specified

In Boundary of wall and baffles I define:

Option : No slip condition
Wall Velocity relative to: mesh motion
Mesh Motion --> Option : specified displacement
Displacement : Cylindrical Coordinate

On theta component : r*t*(2*3.14*1/60[s]) -------------> 1 rpm


I found the wall and baffle were rotate in the cfx post. Are these correct?

Thanks you for your suggestion
nutow is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 18, 2010, 10:44
Default
  #5
New Member
 
Pisit Chaiwiboonpol
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 6
nutow is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by ghorrocks View Post
Your description is not clear but I suspect you have meshed the baffles. Unless you want to model heat flow in the baffles you won't want to do this. Remove the baffles and just leave the walls on the fluid domain left by the baffles. Then this should run fine.
Are these mean as I specified above?

Thanks you
nutow is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 18, 2010, 17:55
Default
  #6
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 10,929
Rep Power: 85
ghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura about
If the motion is purely rotary then you don't need mesh motion. Get rid of that bit, you want to define a rotating frame of reference as it is much simpler.

I think my first post still comments on an issue - have you meshed the baffles as solid bodies? If so then remove them and just use the baffle cutouts in the fluid domain.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 21, 2010, 02:23
Default
  #7
New Member
 
Pisit Chaiwiboonpol
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 6
nutow is on a distinguished road
I changed the mesh like you suggested above.

I meshed the surface of rotary drum by using tri and then extruded them to form prism meshes because I would like to simply my work from 3d to 2d.

After that I did not do anything, I used it in cfx - pre

Is it same that you suggested above?

Thank you very much

nutow is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 21, 2010, 05:02
Default
  #8
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 10,929
Rep Power: 85
ghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura about
Have you done the CFX tutorials? I doubt it if you cannot mesh a simple object like this. You really should do the tutorials as they explain all the basics.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 21, 2010, 05:45
Default
  #9
New Member
 
Pisit Chaiwiboonpol
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 6
nutow is on a distinguished road
I did the tutorial number 9 which is the 2d flow over bump in cfx pre.

Could you suggest the subject of tutorial to me for studying more?

nutow is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 21, 2010, 06:04
Default
  #10
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 10,929
Rep Power: 85
ghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura about
Do as many as you can. Make sure you do the meshing part as well as it appears you do not understand the basics of meshing yet either. The first few tutorials cover meshing better than the later ones.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 21, 2010, 06:28
Default
  #11
New Member
 
Pisit Chaiwiboonpol
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 6
nutow is on a distinguished road
Thanks for your comments. I will do it.
nutow is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 12, 2010, 15:36
Default It should be MRF model in Fluent.
  #12
New Member
 
limin
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 21
Rep Power: 8
zhang.limin is on a distinguished road
It should be MRF model in Fluent.
zhang.limin is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
SnappyHexMesh for internal Flow vishwa OpenFOAM Native Meshers: snappyHexMesh and Others 23 August 6, 2014 03:50
help with Baffles... syd STAR-CCM+ 2 April 27, 2010 17:36
external flow with snappyHexMesh chelvistero OpenFOAM 11 January 15, 2010 20:43
Including baffles in automatic meshing(pro amm) Ankush Aggarwal CD-adapco 2 June 28, 2006 02:24
Loosing baffles while creating a volume mesh Susanne CD-adapco 0 May 9, 2006 02:52


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 00:33.