CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > CFX

boundary conditions outlet-free surface flow

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   October 26, 2010, 06:40
Default boundary conditions outlet-free surface flow
  #1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 110
Rep Power: 7
antonio is on a distinguished road
Hi all.

I am trying to simulate a free surface flow and I am having some problems in what concerns the convergence (the plot of the residuals is highly oscillating). According to the documentation one possible reason is incorrect boundary conditions right?. In some threads some people argue that free surface flows are very sensitive to the outlet height (that we should use experimental data for this height and I donīt have this data in my case). What`s the reason of this? Why the code doesn`t adapt to the specified height by default?

Can someone clarify this point to me?

Best Regards
antonio is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 26, 2010, 08:53
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Michael P. Owen
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 195
Rep Power: 8
michael_owen is on a distinguished road
You just said you don't know the height of the free surface at the outlet, and then you said it is specified. Which is it?

The problem is that the hydrostatic pressure is a function of the depth of the fluid, which is an implicit result of the solution. Often in CFD we are specifying the pressure at the outlet boundary condition to create a well defined problem for the solver. There is a conflict here. If you know the height of the fluid at the outlet, then you can specify the pressure via a CEL expressions like -Density*g*(y-Height)*Water.vf or some such. When you don't know the height a priori, it becomes trickier. Have you looked at the tutorial "Free Surface Flow Over a Bump"?
michael_owen is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 26, 2010, 09:21
Default
  #3
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 110
Rep Power: 7
antonio is on a distinguished road
Hi. Thanks a lot for your comment.

Sorry if i wasn`t very clear. I wanted to say that I do not know exactly the water height at the outlet (I do not have any experimental results). However, as in cfx tutorials they say that specifying velocity at inlet and pressure at outlet it`s the most robust way of specifying boundary conditions, I have made an estimation of this height.

What I wanted to ask is if the solver is somehow extremely sensitive to this initial guess.

P.S. yes i have also looked to the tutorial
Regards
antonio is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 26, 2010, 23:05
Default
  #4
Senior Member
 
Michael P. Owen
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 195
Rep Power: 8
michael_owen is on a distinguished road
Yes, free surface flows can be extremely sensitive to the initial guess. Have you initialized a free surface and the hydrostatic pressure?
michael_owen is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 27, 2010, 07:26
Default
  #5
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 110
Rep Power: 7
antonio is on a distinguished road
Yes, I did. However like I had said itīs hard to achieve convergence.
antonio is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 24, 2011, 06:49
Default
  #6
New Member
 
Vishal
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Bhopal, M.P. (India)
Posts: 18
Rep Power: 6
vishal.indomitable is on a distinguished road
Send a message via Yahoo to vishal.indomitable
Dear,
I am also facing the problem of convergence in my case. As per the talks with the guy from ANSYS, it is not possible to get convergence in flow involving multi-fluid flow.
vishal.indomitable is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 24, 2011, 07:43
Default
  #7
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 10,820
Rep Power: 85
ghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura about
Yes, it is possible to get convergence. But it can be harder for some flows, free surface flows especially.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 11, 2014, 19:24
Default
  #8
Member
 
Amir
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 44
Rep Power: 4
Amir1 is on a distinguished road
Hi guys,

I am wondering what you have selected as the boundary condition for a free surface? can you help me with that?
Thanks
Amir1 is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
non reflective boundary conditions for incompresible flow Pascal_doran OpenFOAM Programming & Development 15 August 7, 2014 05:55
Boundary Conditions for Incompressible Flow Bob FLUENT 0 April 7, 2006 21:28
New topic on same subject - Flow around race car Tudor Miron CFX 15 April 2, 2004 06:18
may I use Pressure inlet Boundary as free surface? duci FLUENT 0 August 23, 2002 22:29
free surface boundary conditions Gerard Moroney Main CFD Forum 2 November 17, 1998 16:49


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:57.