CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > CFX

CFX Ansys convergence(RMS or Max Residual)

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   November 19, 2010, 09:18
Default CFX Ansys convergence(RMS or Max Residual)
  #1
New Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 7
farianka is on a distinguished road
Hi
Can anyone explain the convergence criteria for CFX solver Out file.
I have achieved convergence for RMS Mass and Momentum of bellow 1^10-4 (loose convergence), but in 'Judging convergence' section of CFX Solver manual is mentioned that it shoud be bellow 1^10-5, and the previous value should apply to Max residuals.
That would mean, that my simulation has not converged. However, when I browse internet, many people seem to be happy with the RMS falling bellow 1^10-4, not the Max residuals.
Which is correct?
farianka is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 19, 2010, 17:54
Default
  #2
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 12,539
Rep Power: 97
ghorrocks is a jewel in the roughghorrocks is a jewel in the roughghorrocks is a jewel in the rough
Neither. The comments you have read are just generalisations.

You have to do a sensitivity study and see how tight you need for your particular case.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 20, 2010, 06:24
Question Sensitivity analysis and convergence
  #3
New Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 7
farianka is on a distinguished road
Thank you for your reply, Glen.
I have searched the subject of sensitivity analysis, and I understand it means I have to e.g refine mesh and solve again to see if there is any change in convergence.
Meanwhile I have solved with K-epsilon model and achieved convergence with RMS bellow 1^10-5, but not sure if I can trust the result.
I still do not know the convergence criteria for my case, even if I perform sensitivity analysis with refined mesh and achieve let's say "the same convergence".
My analysis case is the analysis of aerodynamic flow around the car's body - same case as in tutorial of Blunt body (Ahmed model), with the aim to calculate drag and lift at high speeds and compare the results to the wind tunnel results. SST or BSL models are the ones to use, but difficult to converge.
Can I trust the K-e model and what criteria for convergence would you recommend?
Thanks a lot
farianka is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 20, 2010, 07:13
Default
  #4
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 12,539
Rep Power: 97
ghorrocks is a jewel in the roughghorrocks is a jewel in the roughghorrocks is a jewel in the rough
SST vs BSL vs K-E - it depends what you are trying to model. They all have strengths and weaknesses. There are many types of flow none of them can handle.

The concept of a sensitivity analysis is simple enough - vary a single parameter and assess its affect on the outputs and select a setting for the parameter based on the accuracy you wish in the output. But in reality it is difficult because you are doing sensitivity on many variables at once, and the variable might not converge nicely.

So you start by setting everything to your best guess, and vary one parameter at a time, and probably come back and do a few iterations until everything is good.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 20, 2010, 07:33
Default Parameter change
  #5
New Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 7
farianka is on a distinguished road
Thanks, I will try that. I am currently increasing the elements by 500000, so hopefully that will be the change of parameter.
If I am wrong, please correct me.
Thanks a lot
farianka is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 21, 2010, 06:25
Default
  #6
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 12,539
Rep Power: 97
ghorrocks is a jewel in the roughghorrocks is a jewel in the roughghorrocks is a jewel in the rough
Quote:
I am currently increasing the elements by 500000, so hopefully that will be the change of parameter.
If I am wrong, please correct me.
Thanks a lot
I have no idea what you mean by that, but you seem to misunderstand me. You need to establish convergence sensitivity on ALL parameters - mesh, time step size, convergence, imbalances, any other physical models. If any one model is not converged then your results can be rubbish (even if all the others are fine).
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
SimpleFoam k and epsilon bounded nedved OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 13 November 4, 2013 15:13
TwoPhaseEulerFoam and Boundary conditions raagh77 OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 98 September 23, 2013 06:31
lift and drag on ship superstructures vaina74 OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 3 June 8, 2010 12:30
reactingFoam: adiabatic flame temperature rFkhemek OpenFOAM 2 July 31, 2009 06:42
TurbFoam problemlarge Co number sunnysun OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 6 March 10, 2009 09:05


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 00:59.