CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > CFX

LES near wall mesh

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   January 19, 2011, 13:38
Question LES near wall mesh
  #1
Member
 
Timothy
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 33
Rep Power: 7
tav98f is on a distinguished road
I am running LES on an internal flow. I am consiering adding prism layers to my mesh to have good resolution near the wall. I know that tetrahedra are favorable over hexa because isotropy in the mesh is important for LES. Does this also mean that prisms are going to dampen or create turbulence? In other words, is a prism layer a bad idea for LES?

Thank you in advance for your help,
-Timothy
tav98f is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 19, 2011, 20:25
Default
  #2
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 10,652
Rep Power: 84
ghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura about
Where did you get the idea that tets are better than hexes from? It is wrong. If you can use hexes then do so as they are much better than tets. If isotropy is important then use 1:1:1 hexes.

The dissipation in tets, prisms and hexes of similar quality and size is similar. Hexes will be a bit less dissipation in some circumstances. But a big difference is hexes will use less memory.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 20, 2011, 14:33
Red face
  #3
Member
 
Timothy
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 33
Rep Power: 7
tav98f is on a distinguished road
I may have misrepresented what I was trying to say. What I meant is simply the anisotropy is not good. I was trying to mimic what the CFX documentaion says which is, "... consider the use of isotropic grids, perhaps using tetrahedral rather than hexahedral elements."

The reason that I am worried about using a prism layer is that the prism layer a set of layers that are thin extusions of the surface mesh. The size of the 2D projection of an element onto the wall does not change much from layer to layer. The length of the edges perpandicular to the wall, however, increases for each layer further from the wall. So the mesh that is closest to the wall is not isotropic.
tav98f is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 20, 2011, 22:04
Default
  #4
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 10,652
Rep Power: 84
ghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura about
The anisotropy is not due to tet vs hex. The anisotropy is due to poor mesh quality (ie squashed hexes). A 1:1:1 hex is better than a equilateral tet, but reasonable quality tets may be better than high aspect ratio hexes.

Prism meshes are a good idea next to the wall as anisotropy in hex/prism meshes is mainly a problem when the flow is in an artibrary direction. Next to the wall the flow is parallel to the wall, so high aspect ratio elements work OK as they are aligned with the flow.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
les, mesh, prism

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
unstructure mesh size control near to wall using gambit lalit kumar FLUENT 4 July 6, 2010 15:13
NEAR WALL MESH kostas FLUENT 8 December 8, 2008 07:11
Numerical Implementation of LES Wall models dragon Main CFD Forum 2 March 14, 2005 01:53
Multicomponent fluid Andrea CFX 2 October 11, 2004 05:12
turbulence wall law on unstructred mesh Quain Tchew Main CFD Forum 4 March 20, 2002 10:50


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 14:11.