# Help with mass transfer in heat and water vapor exchanger

 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 January 19, 2011, 16:04 Help with mass transfer in heat and water vapor exchanger #1 New Member   Join Date: Dec 2010 Posts: 26 Rep Power: 6 I've been studying heat and water vapor exchangers for some time. I understand there is a close relationship between heat transfer and mass transfer, so initially sought to understand heat transfer in the device. My geometries consist of channels on the order of 1mm rectangles with 10-20mm length, with periodic inlet/oulet. Initially I studied one species (air) with an inward heat flux at one wall and a balancing energy sink over the entire domain. The results were as expected. I am having trouble attempting to accomplish the analogue with species transfer instead of heat transfer. I have entered air and water vapor properties at the temperature and pressure of interest, and initialized the domain with the volume fraction appropriate for my device. One wall has a water vapor source, and the entire domain has a source with a negative constant to balance mass over the periodic domain. The negative source is extracted with velocities u,v,w, as I don't want it to affect the momentum of the air. The rms residuals for species volume fraction are on the order of 0.02-0.04 after 60 iterations with a 10x timescale factor in a simple geometry (rectangular duct with appropriate inlet profile). Basically it is not converging, and of course the solution is nothing like expected. Under fluid pair models I'm asked to enter information for interphase transfer, and drag coefficient. I don't know what this means or if its appropriate, it sounds to me like information for a 2-phase model. Not sure what other details may be appropriate: steady state, laminar, both fluids continuous. Does anybody have any experience with diffusion/advection of one gas in another? edit - I just noticed another problem; the water vapor does not have the same velocity as the fluid average, as it is diffusing perpendicular to the stream. That makes it difficult to choose what velocity to remove it at without impacting the momentum of the other air. Last edited by mullenc525; January 19, 2011 at 20:25.

 January 24, 2011, 13:25 #2 New Member   Join Date: Dec 2010 Posts: 26 Rep Power: 6 bump - surely somebody must have done a problem with water vapor diffusing into air?

 January 24, 2011, 17:41 #3 Super Moderator   Glenn Horrocks Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Sydney, Australia Posts: 11,268 Rep Power: 88 Are you looking purely at diffusion of vapour or does the vapour change physical properties much (ie condense or evaporate, or even just have a significant pressure/temperature change)?

 January 24, 2011, 17:41 #4 Super Moderator   Glenn Horrocks Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Sydney, Australia Posts: 11,268 Rep Power: 88 Simple advection/diffusion can be done very easily with an additional variable. Don't use multiphase unless you need to (and you know how to use it).

 January 24, 2011, 18:10 #5 New Member   Join Date: Dec 2010 Posts: 26 Rep Power: 6 Hi Glenn, Purely diffusion of vapor, no change in state, pressure or temperature. I noticed another thread where someone was looking at ink diffusion into water, and the consensus was to use additional variables. However, a caveat mentioned was that it was only appropriate if you wanted to make the assumption the ink properties were the same as water and mixing ratios low. As we know, water vapor and air are substantially different, and I am working with mixing ratios of about 0.24 (not insignificant). Are additional variables appropriate?

 January 24, 2011, 18:20 #6 Super Moderator   Glenn Horrocks Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Sydney, Australia Posts: 11,268 Rep Power: 88 You can make the properties of the fluid a function of the amount of water vapour to some extent. This should work for a limited range of mass fractions, linked to viscosity, density. Rather than a multiphase approach you might consider a single phase but multi-species approach using mass fractions. If you can't get the range of properties you need you should consider this approach as it will be able to handle pure air to pure vapour and everything in between.

 January 25, 2011, 18:40 #7 New Member   Join Date: Dec 2010 Posts: 26 Rep Power: 6 Thanks Glenn, I've gone the multi component route instead of using an additional variable; it's amazing how easy it is when you know what you are looking for! I've selected water vapor to follow the transport equation with air using the constraint equation. Simply because I know the diffusivity of water in air and this is what somebody else did. Is this appropriate, and how does one select which to use in general? Curtis

 January 26, 2011, 00:26 #8 Super Moderator   Glenn Horrocks Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Sydney, Australia Posts: 11,268 Rep Power: 88 I am no expert on multi-component models but I don't think it matters which one you set up as the constraint. I would try it either way and see what the difference is.

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post yigitktu FLUENT 0 September 22, 2010 08:04 Sas CFX 15 July 13, 2010 08:56 saii CFX 2 September 18, 2009 08:07 hdj CFX 1 November 27, 2005 08:15 Mark CFX 6 November 15, 2004 16:55

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 18:35.