CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > CFX

Coefficient loops vs physical timescale

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   February 12, 2011, 17:20
Default Coefficient loops vs physical timescale
  #1
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 31
Rep Power: 6
Turbomachine is on a distinguished road
Dear All,

I am running transient simulations with mesh deformation of a full 20 blade fan assembly (7 mill. nodes). I am using coefficient loops as the option in convergence control with a maximum number of 100.

Previously I have successfully run simulations with only 2 blades only using the same convergence control. That time adequate convergence was achieved after max. 20 coeff. loops during one mesh deformation step. However this time during many (about 60+%) of the timesteps the coefficient loops pass up to 100 before the simulation proceeds with the next mesh deformation step.

This is unfortunately very inefficient since the computational cost of the simulation becomes very large (20 days of using 8 cores for each run).

I am looking to modify the run in progress either by decreasing the number of coefficient loops. Or by changing to other methods such as physical timescale.

Can anyone advise me which of these is the better way to go? I must also note that the simulations need very high accuracy, however the time to complete them is also finite.

Thank you very much in advance!
Turbomachine is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 13, 2011, 06:54
Default
  #2
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 10,823
Rep Power: 85
ghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura about
Why are you using moving mesh to model a fan? Why not use a rotating frames of reference? It will be an order of magnitude faster to run.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 13, 2011, 13:22
Default
  #3
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 31
Rep Power: 6
Turbomachine is on a distinguished road
I am doing static aeroelasticity analysis on the fan hence I need to model mesh deformation (yes, I am using rotating ref. frame too). I did not enclose the details about this because I thought is was irrelevant. My question was regarding the timestep control though.

I read that it the coefficient loops reach the limit then the timestep will be reduced. Does that mean that by choosing a lower number of coefficient loops (say 50) the change for having too large a time step (and bad convergence) is less likely to occur due to the more frequent modification in timestep? Is there a reason why I should allow more coefficient loops during a timestep? Can someone recommend a number for it?
Turbomachine is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 13, 2011, 20:36
Default
  #4
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 10,823
Rep Power: 85
ghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura about
I do not have any experience in FSI so cannot comment on that directly. But in general in CFX you want to do 3-5 coeff loops per timestep. If you are doing 20 or more it sounds like your timestep is too big.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
control, convergence, fan, timescale, transient

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Superlinear speedup in OpenFOAM 13 msrinath80 OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 18 March 3, 2015 06:36
Viscous resistance coefficient in physical v-model AL FLUENT 0 December 15, 2008 15:52
Automotive test case vinz OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 98 October 27, 2008 09:43
Advice on Physical Timescale Oli CFX 0 January 16, 2007 11:41
SST in 2D? Jesper Sørensen CFX 16 December 23, 2006 09:40


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 15:47.