CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > CFX

why shroud velocity can't be set

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   March 1, 2011, 07:57
Default why shroud velocity can't be set
  #1
New Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 7
myleader is on a distinguished road
I'm simulating a compressor, there is a rotating impeller in it, so I set a rotating domain around the compressor including shroud, back and diffuser.

Then I set the wall boundary for impeller with no wall velocity, and the wall boundary of the housing with counter rotating velocity, but some error occured. There is some hint, but I can't agree with it.

Code:
 +--------------------------------------------------------------------+
 | ERROR #002100080 has occurred in subroutine CHECK_NORMV.           |
 | Message:                                                           |
 | The specified velocity vector on the boundary patch                |
 |                                                                    |
 |  back                                                              |
 |                                                                    |
 | has a significant normal component at one or more faces. One of    |
 | these face locations is                                            |
 |                                                                    |
 |  (x,y,z) = (-1.28389E-02,-9.78577E-03,-9.31152E-03).               |
 |                                                                    |
 | The angle between the specified velocity and the element surface is|
 |   32.872 degrees at this face. This is considered an error because |
 | it implies that the mesh is moving.  The following are possible    |
 | reasons for the error message:                                     |
 | 1. There is a setup error; for example, an incorrect axis of       |
 |    rotation.                                                       |
 | 2. There may be a meshing problem; for example, the nodes on a     |
 |    rotating surface might not lie on the surface of revolution.    |
 | 3. The boundary is curved and the mesh is very coarse. In this     |
 |    case, you may modify the tolerance by increasing the            |
 |    expert parameter 'tangential vector tolerance wall'             |
 |    from its default of 20 degrees.                                 |
 +--------------------------------------------------------------------+
But every one can see, that boundary is orthogonal to x axis, I can't understand why the error message is like this.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 3770563-3.jpg (19.6 KB, 127 views)
myleader is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 2, 2011, 06:57
Default
  #2
New Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 24
Rep Power: 7
Max Efficiency is on a distinguished road
Two methods are possible:

A. Go in CFX-Pre and change the expert parameter as described.

B. Go in ICEM or MEshing and create a finer grid at the responsible surface/body with a higher resolution of surface angles (e.g. 15 instead of 25 degrees resolution).

Of course, you can combine both methods.
Max Efficiency is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 2, 2011, 09:54
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 29
Rep Power: 7
cfdgremlin is on a distinguished road
Somewhere on your boundary 'back', which I think is the one defined with counter-rotation, there is a face/faces that have a significant normal component to the direction of rotation. This boundary needs to define a surface of revolution around the axis of rotation, otherwise it is unphysical.

The problem could be, as mentioned above, that the mesh quality is poor (e.g. some spurious faces ar included in the boundary), but it needs to be checked. If it is just mesh quality, then the tolerance can be lowered to get past the solver hard stop.
cfdgremlin is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 2, 2011, 20:38
Default
  #4
New Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 7
myleader is on a distinguished road
Thank you for your help. Please let me explain something more.

The trouble happens not only at back boundary, it happens at shroud and diffuser boundary, too. They are all axis symmetry to x axis which I set to be the rotation axis.

I used CFX for some time. In the past, I use it to simulate impellers in open field such as wind turbine and ship impeller, so all the interface between rotation domain and static domain were fluid-fluid and frozen stator. This is the first time I meet the outer housing stagnation condition, and I set them to be counter rotating wall, but I fail. I'm really confused about this trouble.
myleader is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 8, 2011, 03:38
Default
  #5
New Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 24
Rep Power: 7
Max Efficiency is on a distinguished road
Please check if the x-axis in your 3d-model is really exactly at the some position compared with the rotation axis.

In other words:
It is possible that the axis of rotation and the x-axis are parallel, but not identical. Everything seems to be okay, but in reality the axis of rotation is wrong and the 3d-model has to be shifted. You have to move the model in a way, that x-axis and axis of rotation of model are identical.

...maybe that helps you. But unfortunately I don't think so.
Max Efficiency is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 9, 2011, 17:03
Default
  #6
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Europe
Posts: 168
Rep Power: 8
joey2007 is on a distinguished road
If you are not using the latest version of CFX, it may also help to try the latest version of CFX.
__________________
-
-
-
-
-
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not forget: I am not paid for answering your questions.


Thousands of issues can cause a division by zero. Please do not capture a thread, with the argument: "I have the same issue ...."
joey2007 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 18, 2011, 04:12
Default
  #7
New Member
 
zzr
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 5
flilk is on a distinguished road
hello,now i have the same problem with you (my simulation is about centrifugal pump with hub and shroud casing ).i have increased the tangential vector torlerance ,and it works,but i'm not sure wether i'm correct ,and now i don't know details about tangential vector torlerance ,like how to chose it's value ,and i don't know my simulation is correct or not?
flilk is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Instalation on ubuntu 710 basilwatson OpenFOAM Installation 17 March 16, 2012 21:16
can i set the velocity and pressure at the inlet at the same time by UDF minyang.cau FLUENT 0 July 14, 2009 23:14
Velocity in Porous medium : HELP! HELP! HELP! Kali Sanjay Phoenics 0 November 6, 2006 07:10
How i can set slip velocity by udf cxzhao FLUENT 0 June 9, 2005 21:34
How to set transient ang velocity? edi ghirardi FLUENT 0 April 12, 2005 09:34


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 21:40.