CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > CFX

Free Surface not exactly at mean water level

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   March 12, 2011, 05:41
Default Free Surface not exactly at mean water level
  #1
New Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 6
FluidH is on a distinguished road
Hi!

I am simulating a free surface problem and have some problems with the initial results.

The problem appears when I have several sections in the domain.
The initial free surface then get a small disturbance when crossing a section.
Do someone know how to avoid this disturbance ?







Regards
FluidH is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 13, 2011, 06:39
Default
  #2
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 10,646
Rep Power: 84
ghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura about
What is the graph showing? I guess you are extracting the free surface location somehow - so who are you extracting it?

Also, is this initial conditions or the final result of the simulation?
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 13, 2011, 07:27
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 6
FluidH is on a distinguished road
The figures shows the isovalue of the water.volume fraction at 0.5, Wich will be the location of the free surface in a 2 phase flow between air and water.
The lowest one shows a closer view at x=3m where I have a section and the free surface get a small jump.

The figures shows the initial result with t=0.0s. So it should be a straight line at z=0 [m].
FluidH is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 13, 2011, 18:56
Default
  #4
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 10,646
Rep Power: 84
ghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura about
If the surface location lines up closely with a element edge, then when you define the initial conditions one side of the interface could have the element edge just above the level and one just below. When you graph the free surface level this can appear as a jump of one element edge length.

If you don't like this then use a blurring function to blurr the transition over a few elements. Then small differences in node location do not affect the free surface location.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 18, 2011, 11:14
Default
  #5
New Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 6
FluidH is on a distinguished road
Thanks for your answer, but maybe I don't understand this blurring function.
The free surface will in general always be evaluated over some grid cells, as my figure shows.

Do You mean that there is a additional blurring function which smooths the surface?

I use the initial volume fraction smoothing in the solver control, but it gives no changes for the location of the free surface.
FluidH is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 20, 2011, 22:14
Default
  #6
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 10,646
Rep Power: 84
ghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura about
No, you have the write the blurring function. Hopefully a CEL expression will do it.

But do you see my point? If you have a line of nodes at z=1m and set the free surface at 1m, then with numerical accuracy the nodes at 0.9999999m will be set as water and the nodes at 1.00000001 will be set as air. This will result in the free surface not being as you intended as it jumps up or down with the mesh numerical accuracy.

Possibly an easier fix is to move the free surface up or down by a small amount. Small enough that it does not matter, but big enough that the mesh numerical accuracy does not affect things.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 21, 2011, 02:55
Default
  #7
New Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 6
FluidH is on a distinguished road
Thanks! I get the point. The free surface will always lie between some grid cells, so the free surface accuracy will be +-the smallest element size.
As you say one can move the initial free surface condition a small amount from the exact value to avoid numerical jumps of one grid cell.

I will try to set ZWL= +-0.00001 away from the actually zero water level.


Regards
FluidH is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
open channel problem (free surface) Andy Chen FLUENT 4 July 10, 2009 01:20
CFX 4.4 New free surface option Viatcheslav Anissimov CFX 0 April 3, 2002 06:27
uptodate water distribution network fredius,magige,tanzanian,(e.a) Main CFD Forum 0 January 27, 2002 08:10
Free Surface Modeling willy FLUENT 11 July 17, 2001 07:07
free convection heat transfer from a heated horizontal surface through a liquid to a thin cooled fin Kaushik FLUENT 1 May 8, 2000 06:47


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 00:10.