CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > CFX

Expression for physical timescale

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   March 21, 2011, 14:55
Default Expression for physical timescale
  #1
Member
 
newansysuser
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 33
Rep Power: 6
xyq102296 is on a distinguished road
From the help file under physical time scale chapter,

"It is often necessary to alter the physical time scale for buoyancy driven flows in order to achieve convergence."

So max physical time scale will be : delta(tmax)=(dL/(B*g*deltaT))^0.5
here L is a length scale associated with the vertical temperature gradient;
deltaT is the temperature variation in the fluid; B is the thermal expansivity of the fluid; g is the gravity

So an expression for the physical time scale is needed.

But for a 3D model with non-uniform mesh ,how to define the CEL of the physical time scale? how to define dL here? deltaT is radial or vertical temperature difference?
xyq102296 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 21, 2011, 20:16
Default
  #2
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 10,807
Rep Power: 85
ghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura about
The equation just gives a first guess estimate. If you could not be bothered working it out you can just make a guess (1s is a good starting point) and just go from there. Obviously a bit of trial and error and not very efficient but should be OK for most cases.

Often the time scale size makes little difference in steady state simulations.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 22, 2011, 03:33
Default
  #3
Member
 
newansysuser
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 33
Rep Power: 6
xyq102296 is on a distinguished road
From the original sentence, "it's often necessary to alter the physical timescale", so I do not need to use a CEL language to alter it from time to time? just use a fixed number for example 1s?
xyq102296 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 22, 2011, 07:53
Default
  #4
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 10,807
Rep Power: 85
ghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura about
Yes, just a fixed number. I change it while the simulation is running (using solver manager) so I can adjust the timestep easily and adjust it if it looks too big or small without having to restart.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 22, 2011, 09:06
Default
  #5
Member
 
newansysuser
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 33
Rep Power: 6
xyq102296 is on a distinguished road
so I guess you use "Edit Run in Progress" under "Tool" Menu.
During the running, I found RMS of U,V,W-Mom and H-energy is one order higher than MAX, for example rms=2.5e-06 and max is 1.4e-04, how shall I modify the physical timescale?
xyq102296 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 22, 2011, 09:14
Default
  #6
Member
 
newansysuser
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 33
Rep Power: 6
xyq102296 is on a distinguished road
the location of high residuals is not very far from the place I am interested in, so I guess this is a local problem. WHile from the attached graph, I do not have poor grid quality, so what kind of step can I do to fix this problem?
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 1.JPG (26.2 KB, 28 views)
xyq102296 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 22, 2011, 22:20
Default
  #7
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 10,807
Rep Power: 85
ghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura about
Do a sensitivity study. Do a simulation using your current convergence, and a second converged to maybe a factor of 10 better. Did values of interest to you change significantly? If not then your current convergence is probably OK.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 23, 2011, 03:59
Default
  #8
Member
 
newansysuser
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 33
Rep Power: 6
xyq102296 is on a distinguished road
Now my convergence criteria is 1e-06, so your suggestion is getting to 1e-05 and see the result?
I have done the grid independent study, the mesh is ok.
And from the help file, it says"When you are having problems converging, you can check RMS and MAX residuals"
I can converge to RMS 1e-06, while my MAX residual is more than one order higher than RMS, so is this a local problem or we can just neglect it since its convergence
Thank you
xyq102296 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 23, 2011, 18:46
Default
  #9
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 10,807
Rep Power: 85
ghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura about
Yes, you can also compare against a run with looser convergence. The aim is to see whether convergence makes any difference.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 24, 2011, 04:04
Default
  #10
Member
 
newansysuser
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 33
Rep Power: 6
xyq102296 is on a distinguished road
The temperature and velocity distribution shape are the same, only I got slightly higher temperature in lower convergence criteria. So do you have any comments on this. I can converge while still there is one order higher between RMS and MAX residual, does it matter? THe MAX residual show near the region of interest
xyq102296 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 24, 2011, 21:33
Default
  #11
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 10,807
Rep Power: 85
ghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura about
I cannot comment on this - it is you to decide. Is the difference between the tight and loose convergence significant for the results you are interested in. Only you know what you are interested in.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Problem About Running Fluent In Linux mitra FLUENT 12 October 15, 2014 09:27
How to install CGNS under windows xp? lzgwhy Main CFD Forum 1 January 11, 2011 19:44
CGNS lib and Fortran compiler manaliac Main CFD Forum 2 November 29, 2010 07:25
Solid Timescale Control Parthipan CFX 2 August 24, 2007 10:07
Lift, Drag Vs time chart,calculations Jamesd69climber CFX 8 February 17, 2005 18:23


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:54.