
[Sponsors] 
March 21, 2011, 14:55 
Expression for physical timescale

#1 
Member
newansysuser
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 33
Rep Power: 7 
From the help file under physical time scale chapter,
"It is often necessary to alter the physical time scale for buoyancy driven flows in order to achieve convergence." So max physical time scale will be : delta(tmax)=(dL/(B*g*deltaT))^0.5 here L is a length scale associated with the vertical temperature gradient; deltaT is the temperature variation in the fluid; B is the thermal expansivity of the fluid; g is the gravity So an expression for the physical time scale is needed. But for a 3D model with nonuniform mesh ,how to define the CEL of the physical time scale? how to define dL here? deltaT is radial or vertical temperature difference? 

March 21, 2011, 20:16 

#2 
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 12,577
Rep Power: 97 
The equation just gives a first guess estimate. If you could not be bothered working it out you can just make a guess (1s is a good starting point) and just go from there. Obviously a bit of trial and error and not very efficient but should be OK for most cases.
Often the time scale size makes little difference in steady state simulations. 

March 22, 2011, 03:33 

#3 
Member
newansysuser
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 33
Rep Power: 7 
From the original sentence, "it's often necessary to alter the physical timescale", so I do not need to use a CEL language to alter it from time to time? just use a fixed number for example 1s?


March 22, 2011, 07:53 

#4 
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 12,577
Rep Power: 97 
Yes, just a fixed number. I change it while the simulation is running (using solver manager) so I can adjust the timestep easily and adjust it if it looks too big or small without having to restart.


March 22, 2011, 09:06 

#5 
Member
newansysuser
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 33
Rep Power: 7 
so I guess you use "Edit Run in Progress" under "Tool" Menu.
During the running, I found RMS of U,V,WMom and Henergy is one order higher than MAX, for example rms=2.5e06 and max is 1.4e04, how shall I modify the physical timescale? 

March 22, 2011, 09:14 

#6 
Member
newansysuser
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 33
Rep Power: 7 
the location of high residuals is not very far from the place I am interested in, so I guess this is a local problem. WHile from the attached graph, I do not have poor grid quality, so what kind of step can I do to fix this problem?


March 22, 2011, 22:20 

#7 
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 12,577
Rep Power: 97 
Do a sensitivity study. Do a simulation using your current convergence, and a second converged to maybe a factor of 10 better. Did values of interest to you change significantly? If not then your current convergence is probably OK.


March 23, 2011, 03:59 

#8 
Member
newansysuser
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 33
Rep Power: 7 
Now my convergence criteria is 1e06, so your suggestion is getting to 1e05 and see the result?
I have done the grid independent study, the mesh is ok. And from the help file, it says"When you are having problems converging, you can check RMS and MAX residuals" I can converge to RMS 1e06, while my MAX residual is more than one order higher than RMS, so is this a local problem or we can just neglect it since its convergence Thank you 

March 23, 2011, 18:46 

#9 
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 12,577
Rep Power: 97 
Yes, you can also compare against a run with looser convergence. The aim is to see whether convergence makes any difference.


March 24, 2011, 04:04 

#10 
Member
newansysuser
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 33
Rep Power: 7 
The temperature and velocity distribution shape are the same, only I got slightly higher temperature in lower convergence criteria. So do you have any comments on this. I can converge while still there is one order higher between RMS and MAX residual, does it matter? THe MAX residual show near the region of interest


March 24, 2011, 21:33 

#11 
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 12,577
Rep Power: 97 
I cannot comment on this  it is you to decide. Is the difference between the tight and loose convergence significant for the results you are interested in. Only you know what you are interested in.


Thread Tools  
Display Modes  


Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Problem About Running Fluent In Linux  mitra  FLUENT  14  February 16, 2016 13:07 
How to install CGNS under windows xp?  lzgwhy  Main CFD Forum  1  January 11, 2011 19:44 
CGNS lib and Fortran compiler  manaliac  Main CFD Forum  2  November 29, 2010 07:25 
Solid Timescale Control  Parthipan  CFX  2  August 24, 2007 10:07 
Lift, Drag Vs time chart,calculations  Jamesd69climber  CFX  8  February 17, 2005 18:23 