CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > CFX

manifold to many small channel design

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   March 24, 2011, 15:46
Default manifold to many small channel design
  #1
New Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 26
Rep Power: 6
mullenc525 is on a distinguished road
I'm designing a manifold for a device similar to a heat exchanger consisting of many small channels, about 300-3000 depending on the scale of the device and whether I decide upon a symmetrical design or not.

Currently I am attempting to mesh the channels with sweep then use an unstructured mesh on the manifolds. This is OK but I cannot figure out how to make the mesh connections 1:1. I am importing a solidworks assembly into CFX-mesh so I have separate 3D regions to mesh. I am unsure of which feature will force the mesh to be 1:1 and uncertain whether an assembly is the most appropriate method to import this geometry.

Also, I have a gut feel the design of the inlet side manifold is much more important than the outlet manifold. I'd like to do some work where I model only the manifold, and each channel is a 2-D region where the pressure on that face is a function of the flux through that region. How can I easily set this up for 300-3000 regions?!
Attached Images
File Type: jpg housing&channels.jpg (82.4 KB, 16 views)
mullenc525 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 24, 2011, 16:26
Default
  #2
New Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 26
Rep Power: 6
mullenc525 is on a distinguished road
It just occured to me that the gaps between the channels probably don't matter much since there are so many channels, on a big scale that surface might behave quite similar to a porous sheet. Does anybody have any opinion on modelling the surface where the channels begin as a porous sheet with an appropriate pressure drop per flux?
mullenc525 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 24, 2011, 21:36
Default
  #3
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 10,477
Rep Power: 83
ghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura about
Exactly.

So get the resistance of the structure - either experimentally or with a CFD simulation of a single channel, then apply that to the big model as a resistance. You might consider an anisotropic resistance in this case as it looks different in the X and Y directions.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 31, 2011, 16:54
Default
  #4
New Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 26
Rep Power: 6
mullenc525 is on a distinguished road
I have this working fairly well, though I have to use the non physical expert parameter 1 for porous cs discretization to make it converge - I'm not sure what impact that will have on my solution.

Now I'm wondering how to evaluate the flow distribution through the porous interface quantitatively. Is there anything like a variance function built in? How could I enter this manually in an expression?
mullenc525 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 1, 2011, 05:06
Default
  #5
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 10,477
Rep Power: 83
ghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura about
By variance do you mean statistical variance? No, that is not built in.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 1, 2011, 12:55
Default
  #6
New Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 26
Rep Power: 6
mullenc525 is on a distinguished road
Is there a better way to quantitatively evaluate flow distribution?

How can I enter something like statistical variance?

I'm not familiar with the fortran features if those are required, I know I need something like an expression:

sum over all locations of (Velocity w(some location)-areaAve(Velocity w )@Domain Interface 1 Side 1)^2
mullenc525 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 3, 2011, 06:56
Default
  #7
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 10,477
Rep Power: 83
ghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura about
You should be able to write this as a CEL expression - and it looks like you have just about done it yourself. Are you able to get it working from there? What is your question?
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 4, 2011, 15:12
Default
  #8
New Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 26
Rep Power: 6
mullenc525 is on a distinguished road
I'm not sure how to sum over all locations in CEL or how to specify the arbitrary location to evaluate velocity w for any given part of that sum.
mullenc525 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 4, 2011, 19:15
Default
  #9
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 10,477
Rep Power: 83
ghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura about
What do you mean by sum? Do you mean integrate - there are functions to do that. Do you mean sum - again, functions to do that. Or simply add a few cases together - well that is simply addition.

Read the CFX CEL reference guide for available commands and functions. I think everything you want will be in there.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
exhaust manifold cfd design irfan FLUENT 2 September 5, 2013 16:22
micro channel heat exchanger design serpil kaya Main CFD Forum 4 August 15, 2013 01:38
CFD package for small propeller turbine design Drona Upadhyay Main CFD Forum 13 November 17, 1999 00:20
Info: Short Course On Thermal Design of Electronic Equipment Arnold Free Main CFD Forum 0 August 10, 1999 10:18
CFD - Trends and Perspectives Jonas Larsson Main CFD Forum 16 August 7, 1998 16:27


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 17:31.